Why don't charges fly off a conductor?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dEdt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Conductor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the question of why charges do not leave the surface of conducting plates in the presence of an electric field, specifically between two parallel plates with opposite charges. The scope includes theoretical considerations of electric fields, the behavior of electrons in conductors, and practical implications in experimental setups like electron microscopes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if the voltage between the plates exceeds the breakdown voltage of the dielectric, electrons can be pulled off, leading to arcing.
  • Others argue that in a vacuum, electrons are bound to protons in the conductor and require a strong electric field to be stripped away, with estimates suggesting a field strength of around 10^11 N/C may be necessary.
  • A participant mentions that field emission techniques, such as those used in electron microscopes, utilize sharp tips to create strong electric fields for electron extraction.
  • Another participant highlights that the distances involved in electron microscopes are much smaller compared to those between capacitor plates, implying that a much stronger electric field would be required for macroscopic separations.
  • There is a discussion about the design and operational parameters of electron microscopes, including the voltages used and the vacuum conditions necessary for effective electron emission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which electrons can leave the surface of conductors, particularly regarding the strength of the electric field required and the implications of different setups. No consensus is reached on the exact mechanisms or necessary conditions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the behavior of electrons in various states (bound vs. free) and the specific conditions required for electron movement in different environments (vacuum vs. dielectric). The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the exact field strengths needed for electron extraction.

dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
To be concrete, consider two parallel conducting plates, one positively charged and the other negatively charged. Why doesn't the electric field between the two plates pull the charges off the surface of the two plates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They can if the voltage is strong enough. If the voltage exceeds the breakdown voltage of the dielectric in between the two plates, you will get arcing of electrons. This is basically what happens during a lightning storm, or when you see sparks fly.

But if the voltage is not strong enough, the insulating material between the plates will prevent the electrons from moving from one plate to the other.
 
Matterwave said:
But if the voltage is not strong enough, the insulating material between the plates will prevent the electrons from moving from one plate to the other.

Let's say that the gap between the two plates is a pure vacuum. What's stopping an electron on the surface on the negatively charged conductor from accelerating towards the other conductor?
 
The electrons are still bound to the protons in the conducting material. They are in the conduction band, but they are still in a bound state. To move them to the other plate, you'd have to take them out of that bound state. Just because you have a conductor doesn't mean you have free electrons that are free to move as they wish.

Remember that electricity is moving electrons, but the electrons usually have to have a path to move through. In a conductor, they move along the conduction band (not out of it). In an insulator that has broken down, they move along the filaments of plasma. In a vacuum, you'd have to really just strip those electrons off the conductor and move them. With a strong enough electric field, I'm sure you can do that. But I don't know how strong of an electric field you would need. My intuition tells me the field must be very strong indeed.

The electric field, classically, of a proton at the typical separation distance of an electron (estimated 1 anstrom) is something like 10^11 N/C (N/C=V/m) so that should give you some indication of perhaps the numbers that are involved. Of course, quantum mechanics will obviously come into play here.

For comparison, the breakdown voltage of air is only 3,000,000 V/m.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
It takes a large field gradient to pull electrons from a 'cold' source in good vacuum. A commonly used method is to use a very sharp tip like is used in a field emission source in a electron microscope.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_emission_gun
http://sites.bio.indiana.edu/~cryo/images/FEG_Tip_001.jpg
 
An electron microscope usually only has the electron jumping very very short distances though right? For a macroscopic separation of the capacitor plates, I would think a ridiculously strong electric field might be needed.
 
Matterwave said:
An electron microscope usually only has the electron jumping very very short distances though right? For a macroscopic separation of the capacitor plates, I would think a ridiculously strong electric field might be needed.

My photo-electron guns had about 5 mm from the cathode to the extraction grid (grounded); the design intent was to support 30,000 volts so that the electrons would have 30 keV as they pass through the extraction grid ~1/3 c.

Any sharp edges resulted in cold cathode emissions (as NSASPOOK mentioned); the vacuum was 10^-9 torr, just at the edge of the ultrahigh vacuum regime. If you do the calculation the field strength is 6 MV/m.

To get rid of sharp edges requires good design, good machining, and lots of polishing. A mirror finish is the desired final state.

For a transmission electron microscope the electron optics column is quite long; a couple of meters for typical modern systems. There are several designs for the emission tip; the older ones used thermal sources with sharp tips, the newer ones use cold emission techniques with atomically sharp tips.

The electron optics usually consists of magnetic lenses, with perhaps some electrostatic devices at the very beginning. Just a few electrons at a time, but at a steady and rapid rate provides a very narrow, intense beam of electrons at the target.

Electron microscope designs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_electron_microscopy
 
Matterwave said:
An electron microscope usually only has the electron jumping very very short distances though right? For a macroscopic separation of the capacitor plates, I would think a ridiculously strong electric field might be needed.

If the capacitor plates were perfectly smooth it would take a ridiculously strong electric field but the reality is they are not.

It's been a while but I remember the acceleration voltage being up to 30k volts to the second anode and ground with the first anode extraction voltage being up to ~6k with a vacuum range of less than 1e-9 Torr with three stage ion pumping at the gun for cross-section inspection type machines (>200,000X mag). We installed new tips and spaced the anode caps by hand in the old days so the distances are not microscopic.

http://cmrf.research.uiowa.edu/scanning-electron-microscopy
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K