Why Don't Heavier Elements Sink to the Sun's Core?

AI Thread Summary
Heavier elements do not sink to the Sun's core due to the dynamic nature of the Sun, which involves significant upwelling and mixing. The core is the most active area where fusion occurs, preventing elements from simply settling. If heavier elements were present, they would not be able to undergo fusion, as the Sun lacks the energy to fuse anything heavier than hydrogen. The discussion highlights the importance of the Sun's activity in maintaining its elemental distribution. Overall, the Sun's structure and processes explain why heavier elements remain detectable at the surface.
Nickelodeon
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
This website gives a break down of the ten most abundant elements from spectrum analysis of the sun

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/961112a.html"

Presumably this result is only valid for the surface/near surface of the sun.

If there were any heavier elements present wouldn't they have a tendency to sink to the core and therefore be undetectable?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
link is broken

sun is not static
there is a lot of upwelling and mixing
and the center is the most active area
as that is where the fusion is happening
so no stuff willnot just sink and stay in the center
 
ray b said:
link is broken

sun is not static
there is a lot of upwelling and mixing
and the center is the most active area
as that is where the fusion is happening
so no stuff willnot just sink and stay in the center

sorry about the link - I've just edited it and it's ok now.

There wouldn't be any fusion going on in the centre if the centre consisted of elements any heavier than hydrogen. Apparently, our sun doesn't have enough energy to fuse anything heavier than hydrogen.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top