Why Don't Unit Vectors in Cartesian Coordinates Change with Time?

AI Thread Summary
Unit vectors in Cartesian coordinates remain constant over time because they are defined based on fixed points in space, such as the vectors from the origin to points like (1,0,0) for the x-axis. The derivative of these unit vectors is zero when their components do not depend on time, indicating they do not change. While vectors like r(t) can change with time if their components are time-dependent, the fundamental unit vectors themselves do not. This stability is due to their definition and the fact that the points they represent do not move. Therefore, unit vectors in Cartesian coordinates are time-invariant.
PhysicsKid0123
Messages
95
Reaction score
1
Quick question (a little rusty on this): Why don't unit vectors in Cartesian Coordinates not change with time? For example, suppose \mathbf{r} (t) = x(t) \mathbf{x} + y(t) \mathbf{y} + z(t) \mathbf{z} How exactly do we know that the unit vectors don't change with time?

Or in other words, what is the argument that justifies this expression: \frac{d }{dt}\mathbf{x} = 0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They can change with time. \mathbb{r(t)} = \sin{t}\mathbb{x} + \cos{t}\mathbb{y} is a unit vector that changes with time. If none of the components depend on time, the derivative will be 0. Otherwise the derivative will be another vector.
 
vancouver_water said:
They can change with time. \mathbb{r(t)} = \sin{t}\mathbb{x} + \cos{t}\mathbb{y} is a unit vector that changes with time. If none of the components depend on time, the derivative will be 0. Otherwise the derivative will be another vector.
I'm talking about the unit vectors in Cartesian coordinates themselves \mathbf{e}_1 = \mathbf{x}, \mathbf{e}_2 = \mathbf{y}, \mathbf{e}_3 = \mathbf{z}
 
##\mathbb{x}## for example can be defined as the vector from the origin to the point ## (1,0,0) ##. Since the two points are not changing with time, the vector won't change with time either.
 
vancouver_water said:
##\mathbb{x}## for example can be defined as the vector from the origin to the point ## (1,0,0) ##. Since the two points are not changing with time, the vector won't change with time either.
okay, that's true, now I remember. Thanks.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top