- 2,461
- 446
Seriously...Granite is 2% heavier than aluminum and takes considerably more time to change with ambient temperature. I value your input. all suggestions welcome.
The discussion revolves around the feasibility and practicality of using granite as a material for beer cans, contrasting it with aluminum. Participants explore various aspects including material properties, manufacturing challenges, and potential applications.
Participants generally express disagreement regarding the viability of granite as a material for beer cans, with multiple competing views on its properties and manufacturing challenges. No consensus is reached on the practicality of using granite in this context.
Limitations include unresolved questions about the specific manufacturing processes required for granite, the energy costs associated with its use, and the implications of its brittleness and thermal properties.
This discussion may be of interest to materials scientists, engineers, and product designers exploring alternative materials for packaging and structural applications.
I'd bet a good sum of your paycheque he's thinking he can invent a new product that would keep beer cooler.Merlin3189 said:So what we have to figure really, is why he's asking this question.
Ranger Mike said:The only advantage of using aluminum is that it weighs 2% less than granite.
Ranger Mike said:The only advantage of using aluminum is that it weighs 2% less than granite. The air bearings on an aluminum Cmm are held on using Belleville cone washers.
Ranger Mike said:This , to me, is not a good method for the long term due to cyclical failure.
Ranger Mike said:I would add that because Al is homogeneous it makes for a noisier CMM as at some point it has resonance. It becomes a tuning fork.