Why E[x^2] = autocorrelation of x evaluated in 0 ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Autocorrelation
mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I was studying the derivation of the solution of Wiener filter from the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiener_filter#Wiener_filter_problem_setup". There is a step I don't quite understand.
First, we define the square error between the estimated signal \hat{s}(t) and the original true signal s(t):

e^2(t) = s^2(t) - 2s(t)\hat{s}(t) + s^2(t)

then the authors calculate the mean value of e^2, that is E[e^2].
At this point I would note that:

E[e^2] = E[s^2] - 2E[s\hat{s}] + E[s^2]

Unfortunately we don't know the probability density function of the original signal s, so we cannot compute E[s^2]. However, the authors of the article seem to suggest that:

E[s^2]=R_s(0)

where R_s(0) is the autocorrelation function of s evaluated at 0 (though I might have misunderstood this).
Could anyone elaborate this point?

I thought that E[s^2]=\int f_{s}(x) x^2 dx, while R_s(0)=\int s(x)s(x)dx
I don't see either, how they solve this problem without any knowledge on the p.d.f. of s.

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
E(s(u)s(v)) = R(|u-v|) by definition. So if u=v we have E(s2(u)) = R(0)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top