Why electrons must occupy degenerate orbitals with parallel spins?

tasnim rahman
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Why electrons occupy degenerate orbitals with parallel spins? heard something of stability due to exchange pairing of electrons. someone kindly clarify this matter.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They needn't. This statement is known as Hunds rule and there are many exceptions known.
The usual argument behind Hunds rule is the following: If the spins are oriented parallel, the orbital part of the wavefunction has to be antisymmetric whence the probability to find two electrons at the same position is 0. This leads to a smaller coulomb repulsion than in a symmetric spatial wavefunction.
 
thank you very much. Just to be sure, what is this exchange pairing of electrons or exchange interaction?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top