Why High frequancy cause high resistance

  • Thread starter Thread starter dumty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cause Resistance
AI Thread Summary
High frequency signals lead to increased resistance due to the scattering of electrons, as described by the Drude Model of conductivity. This model indicates that while conductivity remains relatively stable at low frequencies, it declines significantly as frequency approaches the inverse of the scattering time. At high frequencies, electrons are scattered too rapidly to effectively respond to the electric field, resulting in reduced conductivity. Additionally, the skin effect causes current to flow primarily on the surface of conductors at high frequencies, further contributing to increased resistance. Understanding these principles is crucial for applications in electronics and materials science.
dumty
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
well i have a question in my mind.
is there any mathematical equation or law that shows how the resistance increases as we increase the Frequencies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In fact, there is. One of the simplest models of conductivity is the Drude Model, which assumes that electrons in a solid move freely when an electric field is applied, but are scattered by collisions every so often (with an average lifetime called the scattering time). Surprisingly, it works pretty well for many materials. Wikipedia has a page on it which gives the differential equation and resultant conductivity equation.

Essentially, the conductivity doesn't change by very much at low frequencies, but for frequencies on the order of 1/(scattering time), it drops quickly. Physically, what this means is that for high frequency signals, electrons are getting scattered so quickly that they don't really have a chance to respond to the field.
 
I have read at high frequencies, a metal wire only conducts electricity on the surface, that's why the resistance increases.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top