Why Include Different Powers in Partial Fraction Expansion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swapnil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Partial
AI Thread Summary
When dealing with a repeated root in the denominator of a rational proper function, different powers of the same root are included in the partial fraction expansion to achieve the necessary polynomial degrees in the numerator. This method allows for the representation of the original function by equating coefficients after expanding and simplifying the fractions. For example, in the expression (x^2 + 4x + 7)/(x-3)^3, the expansion leads to simultaneous equations that can be solved for the constants k_1, k_2, and k_3. The final result demonstrates how the original function can be reconstructed using these constants. This approach effectively facilitates the manipulation of polynomial expressions in calculus.
Swapnil
Messages
459
Reaction score
6
Why is it that when you have a repeated root in the denominator of a rational proper function, you include different powers of the same root in the function's partial fraction expansion?

For example,
\frac{x^2 + 4x + 7}{(x-3)^3} = \frac{k_1}{(x-3)} + \frac{k_2}{(x-3)^2} + \frac{k_3}{(x-3)^3}

why do you do this?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It let's you achieve the different powers on the numerator. Eg To get the same denominator, for the first part we must multiply by (x-3)^2, giving us an x^2, then for the 2nd part we must multiply by (x-3), giving us the x, and 3rd part gives us our constant. Subtracting and multiplying these in the end gives up our original expression.

Lets see how this works out in this example.

\frac{x^2 + 4x + 7}{(x-3)^3} = \frac{k_1}{(x-3)} + \frac{k_2}{(x-3)^2} + \frac{k_3}{(x-3)^3}

Multiply to get a common denominator.

\frac{x^2 + 4x + 7}{(x-3)^3} = \frac {k_1 \cdot(x-3)^2 + k_2\cdot(x-3) + k_3}{(x-3)^3}

Expand.

\frac{x^2 + 4x + 7}{(x-3)^3} = \frac {k_1 \cdot x^2 - k_1 \cdot 6x +9 \cdot k_1 +k_2 \cdot x -k_2 \cdot 3 + k_3}{(x-3)^3}

Simplify Like terms etc.

\frac{x^2 + 4x + 7}{(x-3)^3} = \frac {k_1\cdot x^2 + (k_2 -6k_1) \cdot x + (k_3 -3k_2 + 9)}{(x-3)^3}

Phew, that was a bit of confusing tex[/tex]. <br /> <br /> Anyway, The simplest way to solve is to equate co-efficients on both sides :D.<br /> <br /> So we get:<br /> k_1 = 1<br /> (k_2 -6k_1)=4<br /> (k_3 -3k_2 + 9) =7<br /> <br /> YAY! Simultaneous Equations! <br /> <br /> For the 2nd equation, since k_1=1[/tex], the equation simplifies to&lt;br /&gt; k_2 -6=4&lt;br /&gt; k_2 =10&lt;br /&gt; Put that into equation 3. &lt;br /&gt; k_3 -30 + 9 = 7&lt;br /&gt; k_3=28&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; YAY we have our question solved!&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; \frac{x^2 + 4x + 7}{(x-3)^3} = \frac{1}{(x-3)} + \frac{10}{(x-3)^2} + \frac{28}{(x-3)^3}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; HOORAH!
 
Last edited:
thank you Gib Z. that was very well explained.
 
Gib Z said:
It let's you achieve the different powers on the numerator. Eg To get the same denominator, for the first part we must multiply by (x-3)^2, giving us an x^2, then for the 2nd part we must multiply by (x-3), giving us the x, and 3rd part gives us our constant. Subtracting and multiplying these in the end gives up our original expression.
Oh, I see. Makes sense. Thanks.
 
Gib Z said:
It let's you achieve the different powers on the numerator. Eg To get the same denominator, for the first part we must multiply by (x-3)^2, giving us an x^2, then for the 2nd part we must multiply by (x-3), giving us the x, and 3rd part gives us our constant. Subtracting and multiplying these in the end gives up our original expression.

Lets see how this works out in this example.

\frac{x^2 + 4x + 7}{(x-3)^3} = \frac{k_1}{(x-3)} + \frac{k_2}{(x-3)^2} + \frac{k_3}{(x-3)^3}

Multiply to get a common denominator.

\frac{x^2 + 4x + 7}{(x-3)^3} = \frac {k_1 \cdot(x-3)^2 + k_2\cdot(x-3) + k_3}{(x-3)^3}

Expand.

\frac{x^2 + 4x + 7}{(x-3)^3} = \frac {k_1 \cdot x^2 - k_1 \cdot 6x +9 \cdot k_1 +k_2 \cdot x -k_2 \cdot 3 + k_3}{(x-3)^3}

Simplify Like terms etc.

\frac{x^2 + 4x + 7}{(x-3)^3} = \frac {k_1\cdot x^2 + (k_2 -6k_1) \cdot x + (k_3 -3k_2 + 9)}{(x-3)^3}

Phew, that was a bit of confusing tex[/tex]. <br /> <br /> Anyway, The simplest way to solve is to equate co-efficients on both sides :D.<br /> <br /> So we get:<br /> k_1 = 1<br /> (k_2 -6k_1)=4<br /> (k_3 -3k_2 + 9) =7<br /> <br /> YAY! Simultaneous Equations! <br /> <br /> For the 2nd equation, since k_1=1[/tex], the equation simplifies to&lt;br /&gt; k_2 -6=4&lt;br /&gt; k_2 =10&lt;br /&gt; Put that into equation 3. &lt;br /&gt; k_3 -30 + 9 = 7&lt;br /&gt; k_3=28&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; YAY we have our question solved!&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; \frac{x^2 + 4x + 7}{(x-3)^3} = \frac{1}{(x-3)} + \frac{10}{(x-3)^2} + \frac{28}{(x-3)^3}&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; HOORAH!
&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; When your rusty, it&amp;#039;s best to peack over someone shoulders.&lt;img src=&quot;https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png&quot; class=&quot;smilie smilie--emoji&quot; loading=&quot;lazy&quot; width=&quot;64&quot; height=&quot;64&quot; alt=&quot;:rolleyes:&quot; title=&quot;Roll Eyes :rolleyes:&quot; data-smilie=&quot;11&quot;data-shortname=&quot;:rolleyes:&quot; /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I use to remember how to that, 1st year Calculus.&lt;br /&gt; Excellent job.
 
Lol thanks guys, Its fine. If you guys look over to my thread on Integrals, I am horrible :P
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top