I Why is ##2 \pi /T## multiplied by R for v?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Superposed_Cat
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the relationship between linear velocity and angular velocity in circular motion, specifically how the formula v = (2π/T)R derives from the angular frequency ω = (2π/T). The multiplication by R represents the radius of the circular path, linking linear and angular motion. A comparison is made to pendulum motion, questioning why a similar radius term does not appear in its equations. The distinction between angular frequency and linear velocity is emphasized, with the conclusion that linear velocity is indeed the product of angular velocity and radius. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing motion in circular paths.
Superposed_Cat
Messages
388
Reaction score
5
Hey all, $$v = 2 \pi f =2 \pi \frac{1}{T} =\frac{2 \pi }{T} $$ but why is it multiplied by $$R$$? Any help appreciated.
upload_2016-6-7_16-31-27.png


I see now why R is multiplied in now, but why inst L multiplied in in the analogous pendulum equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A particle moving with constant angular velocity ##\omega## on a circle is decribed by the position vector
$$\vec{x}=\begin{pmatrix}
r \cos(\omega t) \\ r \sin (\omega t) \\ 0
\end{pmatrix}.$$
The time derivative gives the velocity
$$\dot{\vec{x}}=\vec{v}=\begin{pmatrix}
-r \omega \sin(\omega t) \\ r \omega \cos(\omega t)
\end{pmatrix}.$$
The magnitude thus is
$$|\vec{v}|=r \omega.$$
 
  • Like
Likes Superposed_Cat and QuantumQuest
The first relation you write is angular frequency not velocity: ##\omega = \frac{2\pi}{T}##. Then ##\upsilon = \frac{2\pi}{T} R = \omega R##
 
  • Like
Likes Superposed_Cat
Ok, to be very precise, the angular velocity in my example is ##\vec{\omega}=\omega \vec{e}_z##.
 
Thanks all, :)
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...

Similar threads

Back
Top