Why is a magnet not an infinite source of energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether a magnet can be considered an infinite source of energy when it is used to resist the force of gravity on a vertical surface. Participants explore the concepts of force, energy, and work, and how they relate to the behavior of magnets in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if a magnet can stay in place indefinitely on a vertical surface and whether this implies it is supplying infinite energy to resist gravity.
  • Another participant compares the magnet's behavior to that of a kitchen table, suggesting that both can maintain their position without expending energy.
  • A different participant emphasizes the distinction between force and energy, stating that energy is only expended when a force moves through a distance, which does not occur with a stationary magnet.
  • Some participants discuss the role of friction in holding the magnet in place, suggesting that it is the friction, not the magnetic field, that prevents the magnet from falling.
  • There is mention of the concept of perpetual motion and how misunderstandings about force and work contribute to such ideas.
  • One participant introduces the idea that the net work is zero due to the absence of movement, while another notes that movement is relative and that the net force on the magnet is what matters.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of a magnet's ability to hold itself in place. While some agree on the distinction between force and energy, others raise questions about the role of friction and the conditions under which the magnet operates. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of understanding the definitions of energy, force, and work, indicating that there may be assumptions or nuances that are not fully addressed in the discussion.

aspaceo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys

Could someone please point out where I'm going wrong with the following problem.

If I place a magnet on a vertical surface such that the magnet must resit the force of gravity in order to hold itself in place, will this magnet stay in place forever? If it does why does this not mean the magnet is supplying infinite energy to resit the force of gravity. My thinking was that the magnet would naturally degrade over time thus getting out of the infinite energy problem, however, I'm not at all convinced this is correct.

Any help you can give me on this problem would be hugely appreciated.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi aspaceo! http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif

Your kitchen table is holding itself in place, too, without the expenditure of energy.

Practical magnets do degrade with time, but measured in years if you don't knock them about.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
aspaceo said:
Hi Guys

Could someone please point out where I'm going wrong with the following problem.

If I place a magnet on a vertical surface such that the magnet must resit the force of gravity in order to hold itself in place, will this magnet stay in place forever? If it does why does this not mean the magnet is supplying infinite energy to resit the force of gravity. My thinking was that the magnet would naturally degrade over time thus getting out of the infinite energy problem, however, I'm not at all convinced this is correct.

Any help you can give me on this problem would be hugely appreciated.

Thanks

This is all about the difference between Force and Energy. To 'get' Energy out of a device, a Force has to be moved through a Distance. Once a magnet has attracted a piece of iron (or a ball has rolled down a hill, spring being stretched etc. etc.) then more Energy (in the form of Work) needs to be transferred to go back to the start situation. A Force, exerted for millions of years, even, is doing no work if there is no movement.

In the case of an Electromagnet, you need to supply Energy (Electrical, this time) to generate the Magnetic Field and the field 'holds' energy, if you like. In an electromagnet, the (mechanical) Force times Distance is in a different (electromagnetic) form but you still have to put in Energy to set things up.

Perpetual Motion is a verboten subject on PF but many of the cranky ideas and suggestions about PM are based on a lack of appreciation of the difference between Force and Work. It can be an interesting exercise to de-bunk some of those loopy ideas you can find elsewhere on the Internet.
 
aspaceo said:
Hi Guys

Could someone please point out where I'm going wrong with the following problem.

If I place a magnet on a vertical surface such that the magnet must resit the force of gravity in order to hold itself in place, will this magnet stay in place forever? If it does why does this not mean the magnet is supplying infinite energy to resit the force of gravity. My thinking was that the magnet would naturally degrade over time thus getting out of the infinite energy problem, however, I'm not at all convinced this is correct.

Any help you can give me on this problem would be hugely appreciated.

Thanks

Who needs magnets? Why isn't a postage stamp or a piece of adhesive tape 'an infinite source of energy'? Both items stick to vertical surfaces.
 
If you look up the basic definitions of energy, force, and work you will see why a magnet does not have infinite energy.
 
What Drakkith said.

Work or Energy = force x distance.

The magnet doesn't move so the distance is zero and the energy expended is zero.

Consider what would happen if you put a thin bit of ice or oil between a fridge magnet and a fridge door. Thin enough that the magnet is still attracted to the door strongly. Would the magnet still hold itself up or slide to the floor?

It's the friction between the magnet and the fridge door that holds it up not the magnetic field. Gluing something to the fridge door is just another way of increasing the friction. The paint on the fridge door doesn't need an energy source to stop itself falling off either :-)
 
CWatters said:
Work or Energy = force x distance.

The magnet doesn't move so the distance is zero and the energy expended is zero.
That is only true in the rest frame of the magnet. There are inertial frames where the magnet does move. The key, to why the net work is zero, is not movement (which is relative) but the zero net force on the magnet.
 
Last edited:
CWatters said:
What Drakkith said.

Work or Energy = force x distance.

The magnet doesn't move so the distance is zero and the energy expended is zero.

Consider what would happen if you put a thin bit of ice or oil between a fridge magnet and a fridge door. Thin enough that the magnet is still attracted to the door strongly. Would the magnet still hold itself up or slide to the floor?

It's the friction between the magnet and the fridge door that holds it up not the magnetic field. Gluing something to the fridge door is just another way of increasing the friction. The paint on the fridge door doesn't need an energy source to stop itself falling off either :-)
Not a very good example what if the door was horizontal,friction won't be holding it up then!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K