Why is c the Limit? Understanding the Speed of Light Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter prasannapakkiam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
prasannapakkiam
I was explaining SR to someone today. I explained why c is the threshold. I think my explanaiton is invalid - is it?
*I said that with x amount of energy, a lower mass would go faster. thus something with no mass would have no inertia, thus would go the fastest.
*Also something that requires no medium would also go faster than something that does.

Well the guy buyed it (for now:rolleyes:) But I better come up with a better explanation. So can anyone quickly explain or give me a link to tell me why c is the limit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think a kinematical explanation may be simpler. The axioms of the principle of relativity and finite invariant velocity leads to the (correct) velocity addition rule. From there you can explain why no inertial observer can measure an object to be traveling a velocity greater than that invariant velocity.

It turns out light also travels at that invariant velocity; although these days, the speed of light is a definition, if I'm not mistaken.
 
No I understand Lorenz to relativistic mass. All I wish to know is that reason for why the speed of light is chosen
 
If the question is, why c has the value that it has, it might help slightly to note that:

1. in natural units we should and do set c=1,

2. its not easy to cook up kinematical theories with more than one characteristic speed associated with the symmetry group of the fundamental equations. In particular, the Lorentz group only admits one characteristic speed, and it makes sense to adopt units in which c=1.

(Kinematics is the study of motion. The two types of kinematics most of us at PF are familiar with are Galilean kinematics, which is used in Newtonian physics, and relativistic kinematics or "special relativity", which is used in relativistic physics.)
 
The linking of the "speed of light" with relativity is mainly due to historical reasons. Maxwell's equations, aether, and Einstein resolving all the mess, eventually.

But I find the more modern treatment simpler: SR starts with the postulate there exists an finite, invariant speed, i.e. one which is same for all inertial frames(call it c). In comparison, in pre-Einsteinian mechanics, if there is an invariant speed, it should be infinitely large. This c turns out to be equal to the measured speed of light.
 
neutrino said:
The linking of the "speed of light" with relativity is mainly due to historical reasons. Maxwell's equations, aether, and Einstein resolving all the mess, eventually.

But I find the more modern treatment simpler: SR starts with the postulate there exists an finite, invariant speed, i.e. one which is same for all inertial frames(call it c). In comparison, in pre-Einsteinian mechanics, if there is an invariant speed, it should be infinitely large. This c turns out to be equal to the measured speed of light.

interestingy, that's what I thought... Well there is definitely a c - and it is not infinity.:smile:
 

Thread 'Describing the Big Bang'

I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Does time dilation occur due to the speed limit of light or c?
Replies
47
Views
4K
B Let me ask a thing about the Speed of Light
Replies
6
Views
1K
B c^2 in Einstein‘s theory of relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
B Explanation of light speed limit
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Synchronizing clocks at different locations to measure speed of light
Replies
43
Views
3K
B How does Einstein's equation work? Why do we need to square c?
Replies
18
Views
1K
I Please explain how length contraction and time dilation result in a constant c
Replies
4
Views
160
I Light Speed in Dense Medium: Explained
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Has anyone measured the speed of light in one direction?
Replies
45
Views
6K
I A question about the speed of light and electromagnetism
2
Replies
51
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top