I Why Is Convection Efficient in the Outer Layers of Stars?

AI Thread Summary
Convection is an efficient mode of energy transport in the outer layers of stars due to increased opacity, which enhances its effectiveness compared to radiation. When surface temperatures exceed approximately 10,000 K, radiative diffusion can easily handle the luminosity, but at lower temperatures, diffusion becomes inefficient. In these cases, the star's envelope cannot maintain the necessary temperature gradient through radiation alone, leading to convective instability. This instability allows hot gas parcels to rise, effectively transporting heat to the surface. Consequently, convection becomes the primary mechanism for energy transport in cooler stellar environments.
mjda
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand why convection is an efficient mode of energy transport in the outer layers of the solar interior.

Could anyone give me a little bit of knowledge?

Thank you!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
mjda said:
I'm trying to understand why convection is an efficient mode of energy transport in the outer layers of the solar interior.

Could anyone give me a little bit of knowledge?

Thank you!
You might try to search some details regarding opacity. The increased opacity in the upper layers makes convection more efficient in energy transport comparing to radiation.
 
The details do depend on opacity, but the basic phenomenon can be understood without reference to what is happening with the opacity (as explained, for example, in Kippenhahn and Wiegert, Stellar Structure and Evolution, pg. 75). The main point is, if you consider the interior structure, it supports a radiative diffusion rate that determines a luminosity that the envelope of the star will simply have to handle somehow. A main-sequence star has nothing drastically unusual happening to its envelope, so you cannot really alter the stellar radius much. Given the luminosity and the radius, the surface temperature is more or less handed to the envelope by the Stefan-Boltzmann law, so the envelope just has to deal with that somehow. When the surface temperature handed to the envelope is large, there's no problem, but when it's smaller, there is a problem as we shall see.

Now, if you assume the stellar envelope transports heat predominantly by radiative diffusion, the imposed temperature structure encounters no particular difficulty if the surface temperature is allowed to be rather high (say above about 10,000 K when you put in the details of the opacity). Above that temperature, it turns out that the structure of the envelope is pretty insensitive to what that temperature is, and the envelope happily diffuses out whatever luminosity is required because radiative energy diffuses easily when the temperature is high. (This is a consequence of the fact that the energy density stays high if the temperature stays high, so you don't need much in the way of a diffusion speed to get out the luminosity.) However, if your requirement is that the surface temperature be well below 10,000 K, then you have a serious problem, because at those low temperatures, radiative energy does not diffuse easily-- it requires a high diffusion speed because the energy density, which scales like T^4, is so low. In fact, you need a steeper temperature gradient than is stable to convection in order to get the luminosity out. So the star finds a different mode for transporting the heat, it goes convectively unstable and moves hot parcels of gas upward instead of diffusing radiation. This also reduces the temperature gradient to something that keeps the temperature from going to zero before you get to the surface of the star (a problem that radiative diffusion has when it becomes inefficient at lower T).
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top