Why Is dr/dt=-V in Polar Coordinates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrax
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of variables in a physics problem involving polar coordinates. It clarifies that in this context, V represents the velocity of the downward pull on the string, not the tangential velocity, which is why the relationship V = rw does not apply. The equation dr/dt = -V indicates that as the vertical string length increases, the radius r decreases. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the meaning of each variable before applying equations. Misinterpretations can lead to incorrect conclusions in solving physics problems.
Andrax
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
wPdNsUI.png

In the solution , it says we have dr/dt= -V (polar coordinates)
How? i can't see how this can be possible , we know that r(t)=V/w(t), and that's it .
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Andrax said:
wPdNsUI.png

In the solution , it says we have dr/dt= -V (polar coordinates) How? i can't see how this can be possible ,
r gets smaller as the vertical string gets longer.

Andrax said:
we know that r(t)=V/w(t), and that's it .
Why?
 
You have to be careful when using equations in physics. You cannot just blindly plug in variables, you need to know what each variable means.

In this problem V is NOT the tangential velocity so V is not equal to rw as it is in many circular motion problems. Here V is the velocity of the downward pull on the string.
 
DaleSpam said:
You have to be careful when using equations in physics. You cannot just blindly plug in variables, you need to know what each variable means.

In this problem V is NOT the tangential velocity so V is not equal to rw as it is in many circular motion problems. Here V is the velocity of the downward pull on the string.

thank you , the differential equations gives me w(t)=2 if i use V=rw , i just presumed that since it's alays used in these kind of problems
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top