Why is E = hf applicable to electrons with quantized energy?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter budafeet57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the equation E = hf to electrons with quantized energy, exploring its implications in quantum mechanics and the relationship between energy and frequency for particles. The scope includes theoretical considerations, quantum mechanics, and the interpretation of energy levels in atomic models.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the applicability of E = hf to electrons, suggesting it is primarily associated with photons and may not directly describe electron energy.
  • Others argue that E = hf can be used to determine the energy changes when electrons transition between energy levels, potentially emitting energy in various forms.
  • A participant presents a specific problem involving an electron with 511 keV and 100 MeV kinetic energy, calculating its frequency as 2.43*10^22 Hz using f = E/h.
  • Some participants note that this frequency corresponds to the electron's De Broglie wavelength, suggesting a connection between wave-like properties of particles and energy.
  • One participant expresses confusion about how frequency can be assigned to particles and questions the relationship between energy, frequency, and the wave equation c = fλ.
  • Another participant mentions that the connection between energy and frequency for particles arises from relativistic wave equations, indicating a broader applicability beyond photons.
  • A later reply connects E = hf for electrons to the Schrödinger equation, highlighting the frequency of stationary states in quantum mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the interpretation and applicability of E = hf to electrons. While some support its use in specific contexts, others challenge its relevance and express uncertainty about the underlying principles.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the relationship between energy and frequency for particles, as well as the dependence on definitions of energy in different contexts. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

budafeet57
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I came across a problem my teacher assigned. We are asked to calculate frequency of electron having certain energy. My teacher used E = hf to solve the problem. I thought that could only be applied to photon. Is it because electron has wave-like nature and has quantized energy?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay . You need to clear your fundamentals from your teacher.
E=hf. does not give the energy of electron. It gives the energy required / released when electrons change their energy levels. And this energy may be radiated in the form of photons or by heat or any other form.

I recommend you to go through Bohr's postulates regarding Atomic model.
 
The question is given like this:
electron has 511keV and kinetic energy of 100 MeV and determines its frequency.
the answer is 2.43*10^22 Hz, which can be determined through f = E/h.

I just wonder how can my teacher use the equation like that for such straightforward question.
 
budafeet57 said:
The question is given like this:
electron has 511keV and kinetic energy of 100 MeV and determines its frequency.
the answer is 2.43*10^22 Hz, which can be determined through f = E/h.

I just wonder how can my teacher use the equation like that for such straightforward question.
It's the frequency corresponding to the electron's De Broglie wavelength. E = 100.511 MeV, f = E/h.
 
It is a quantum-mechanical frequency, and the connection between energy and frequency is the same for all particles.
 
E=hf is fine for describing the energy associated with a photon but I am not familiar with assigning frequency to energy for a particle. There is a relationship between wavelength (de Broglie) and momentum for particles (P=h/λ) but where does a constant relationship between Energy and Frequency for particles come in? Where would that leave the equation for waves 'c=fλ' for instance?
What am I missing here?
 
This comes from relativistic wave equations - but even in the "classic" case, an electron with 100 MeV kinetic energy has E≈pc=hc/λ=hcf/v≈hf.
 
Last edited:
We can connect E = hf for an electron to the Schrödinger equation for matter waves by examining the time dependency of a stationary state.

[itex]| \Psi (t)> = e^{-iE_{n}t/\hbar}| n>[/itex]

Where |n> represents a stationary (stable) state at time zero, and En represents the energy of that state. Now, if we substitute into the above equation the following:

[itex]E_{n} = hf = \hbar \omega = \hbar 2\pi f[/itex]

Then, we'd get

[itex]| \Psi (t)> = e^{-i2\pi ft}| n >[/itex]

Notice that the exponential multiplying the stationary state has a frequency of magnitude [itex]f[/itex]. So the phase of a stationary state of a matter wave (from Schrödinger's equation) cycles at a frequency given by the energy of the state and the equation E = hf.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K