I Why is estimation of ##\frac{Pv}{RT}=1+BP+CP^2+...## interesting?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equation ##\frac{Pv}{RT}=1+BP+CP^2+...##, which models the behavior of real gases compared to ideal gases. It highlights that for real gases, deviations from ideal behavior can be quantified, with values above 1 indicating larger molar volumes due to intermolecular forces. The formulation is particularly interesting because it allows for the estimation of virial coefficients, which describe these deviations at various pressures and temperatures. The relationship provides a straightforward method to assess how real gases behave under different conditions, especially at higher pressures. Overall, this equation serves as a critical tool in understanding gas behavior beyond the ideal gas law.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
TL;DR Summary
There is a derivation in the book Heat and Thermodynamics by Zemansky and Dittman which links the ideal gas law to an empirical power series equation relating ##Pv## and ##P##. The final equation of the derivation is ##\frac{Pv}{RT}=1+BP+CP^2+...## and there is a table with the estimated virial coefficients for nitrogen gas. I would like to know what makes this particular form of the equation interesting?
Consider ##n## moles of a gas at a constant temperature ##T##.

If we vary pressure ##P## and measure the corresponding values of volume ##V##, we can make a plot of ##P\frac{V}{n}=Pv## against ##P##.

This gives us some graph which has some form. Turns out that for a range of pressure starting at 0 the graph is approximately linear. At higher pressures, it becomes more nonlinear.

We can model this relationship using a power series

$$Pv=A(1+BP+CP^2+...)\tag{1}$$

Empirically, we see that for any such plot (ie, for any gas), the vertical intercept is the same. That is, ##A## is the same in the power series.

We can find what this limiting value is from the ideal gas law. For a constant volume gas, we have

$$T=273.16\text{K} \cdot \lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} \left ( \frac{P}{P_{TP}} \right )\tag{2}$$

$$=273.16\text{K} \frac{\lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} Pv}{\lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} P_{TP}v}\tag{3}$$

and so

$$\lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} Pv = \frac{\lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} P_{TP}v}{273.16\text{K}}\cdot T\tag{4}$$

$$=RT$$

where $R$ is the molar gas constant.

We can also write

$$\lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} PV=nRT\tag{5}$$

which is an equation of state for a gas in a hypothetical limit of low pressure.

Now, let's go back to the idea of modeling the entire relationship between ##Pv## and ##P##.

$$Pv=A(1+BP+CP^2+...)=RT(1+BP+CP^2+...)\tag{6}$$

$$\frac{Pv}{RT}=1+BP+CP^2+...\tag{7}$$

My question is about equation (7). Essentially, why is it interesting in this form?

Consider the following table

1699757379781.png


Here we have estimates for the virial coefficients in (7) for nitrogen gas.

Why is the formulation in (7) interesting?

Here is my attempt to answer this
- If the gas were ideal then we would have ##\frac{Pv}{RT}=1##. That is, ##B=C=D=...=0##.

- But we are dealing with a real gas.

- For a fixed temperature, if the value of ##\frac{Pv}{RT}## is above 1 then I assume this means that the molar volume is larger than expected for an ideal gas. I remember reading something in the past about intermolecular forces. Is this the origin of such a discrepancy at higher pressures?

- Below, I take the values of the table above for three temperatures and plot equation (7).

idealgas.png


Thus, it seems that (7) allows us to gauge deviation from ideal gas behavior in a relatively simple way, namely deviation from 1.
 

Attachments

  • 1699756239465.png
    1699756239465.png
    16.8 KB · Views: 99
Physics news on Phys.org
zenterix said:
TL;DR Summary: There is a derivation in the book Heat and Thermodynamics by Zemansky and Dittman which links the ideal gas law to an empirical power series equation relating ##Pv## and ##P##. The final equation of the derivation is ##\frac{Pv}{RT}=1+BP+CP^2+...## and there is a table with the estimated virial coefficients for nitrogen gas. I would like to know what makes this particular form of the equation interesting?

- For a fixed temperature, if the value of PvRT is above 1 then I assume this means that the molar volume is larger than expected for an ideal gas. I remember reading something in the past about intermolecular forces. Is this the origin of such a discrepancy at higher pressures?
Ideal gas has no molecule volume. Real gas molecules have volume which makes upward tendency in the graph. Some real gas molecules have in general attractive forces between which makes downward tendency.
 
zenterix said:
TL;DR Summary: There is a derivation in the book Heat and Thermodynamics by Zemansky and Dittman which links the ideal gas law to an empirical power series equation relating ##Pv## and ##P##. The final equation of the derivation is ##\frac{Pv}{RT}=1+BP+CP^2+...## and there is a table with the estimated virial coefficients for nitrogen gas. I would like to know what makes this particular form of the equation interesting?

Consider ##n## moles of a gas at a constant temperature ##T##.

If we vary pressure ##P## and measure the corresponding values of volume ##V##, we can make a plot of ##P\frac{V}{n}=Pv## against ##P##.

This gives us some graph which has some form. Turns out that for a range of pressure starting at 0 the graph is approximately linear. At higher pressures, it becomes more nonlinear.

We can model this relationship using a power series

$$Pv=A(1+BP+CP^2+...)\tag{1}$$

Empirically, we see that for any such plot (ie, for any gas), the vertical intercept is the same. That is, ##A## is the same in the power series.

We can find what this limiting value is from the ideal gas law. For a constant volume gas, we have

$$T=273.16\text{K} \cdot \lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} \left ( \frac{P}{P_{TP}} \right )\tag{2}$$

$$=273.16\text{K} \frac{\lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} Pv}{\lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} P_{TP}v}\tag{3}$$

and so

$$\lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} Pv = \frac{\lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} P_{TP}v}{273.16\text{K}}\cdot T\tag{4}$$

$$=RT$$

where $R$ is the molar gas constant.

We can also write

$$\lim\limits_{P_{TP}\to 0} PV=nRT\tag{5}$$

which is an equation of state for a gas in a hypothetical limit of low pressure.

Now, let's go back to the idea of modeling the entire relationship between ##Pv## and ##P##.

$$Pv=A(1+BP+CP^2+...)=RT(1+BP+CP^2+...)\tag{6}$$

$$\frac{Pv}{RT}=1+BP+CP^2+...\tag{7}$$

My question is about equation (7). Essentially, why is it interesting in this form?

Consider the following table

View attachment 335216

Here we have estimates for the virial coefficients in (7) for nitrogen gas.

Why is the formulation in (7) interesting?

Here is my attempt to answer this
- If the gas were ideal then we would have ##\frac{Pv}{RT}=1##. That is, ##B=C=D=...=0##.

- But we are dealing with a real gas.

- For a fixed temperature, if the value of ##\frac{Pv}{RT}## is above 1 then I assume this means that the molar volume is larger than expected for an ideal gas. I remember reading something in the past about intermolecular forces. Is this the origin of such a discrepancy at higher pressures?

- Below, I take the values of the table above for three temperatures and plot equation (7).

View attachment 335217

Thus, it seems that (7) allows us to gauge deviation from ideal gas behavior in a relatively simple way, namely deviation from 1.
Yes. Equation 7 is a relationship for calculating the "compressibility factor" z.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top