Why is F a function of the similarity variable in dimensional analysis?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a diffusion equation related to a semi-infinite rod, where the temperature profile is influenced by time and spatial variables. The original poster seeks to understand why a function F, representing temperature changes, depends solely on a similarity variable derived from dimensional analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the dimensionality of the function F and its dependence on various parameters, questioning the roles of θ₀ and k in the similarity variable. They attempt to express F in terms of dimensionless quantities and consider the implications of dimensional analysis.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their reasoning and questioning assumptions about the dimensional relationships between the variables involved. Some have proposed potential forms for F, while others express uncertainty about the implications of their findings.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the presence of multiple variables with distinct units, leading to confusion about how to isolate the similarity variable and demonstrate the independence of F from θ₀ and k.

chewwy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Just read this, and got a bit confused when trying to do it...

Homework Statement



We have a diffusion equation situation with a semi-infinite rod, so:

\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial t} = \lambda \frac{\partial^2 \theta }{\partial x^2 }

at infinity the rod is at some fixed temperature \theta_0, whilst at x=0, the temperature increases proportionally to time. write \theta(x,t)=\theta_0 + ktF.

explain with the help of dimensional analysis why F is a function only of the similarity variable \zeta = \frac{x}{\sqrt{\lambda t}}, and is independent of \theta_0 and k.

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, right... so F must be dimensionless. but we have five variables here - \theta_0 , x, t, \lambda , k. how do we show \theta_0 and k aren't involved?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can get to the fact that F must be a function of (\frac{\theta_0}{kt})^a (\frac{x}{\sqrt{\lambda t}})^b

but then I'm stuck...
 
this is almost certainly wrong but if \theta_0 has units of temperature and t has units seconds and k is of units Ks^{-1} then \frac{\theta_0}{kt} has units \frac{K}{Ks^{-1}s} which all cancel so that's just a constant, then you have

F = C \zeta^b with C a constant. Don't you?
 
latentcorpse said:
this is almost certainly wrong but if \theta_0 has units of temperature and t has units seconds and k is of units Ks^{-1} then \frac{\theta_0}{kt} has units \frac{K}{Ks^{-1}s} which all cancel so that's just a constant, then you have

F = C \zeta^b with C a constant. Don't you?

just because a quantity is dimensionless does not make it constant - it's a function of t!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K