Why is F a function of the similarity variable in dimensional analysis?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the diffusion equation for a semi-infinite rod, the focus is on understanding why the function F depends only on the similarity variable ζ = x/√(λt) and not on the constants θ0 and k. It is established that F must be dimensionless and can be expressed in terms of the variables involved. The analysis shows that while θ0 and k have units, their ratio with time leads to a constant, indicating they do not influence F's dependency on ζ. The conclusion emphasizes that being dimensionless does not imply that F is constant; rather, it is a function of the similarity variable over time. This highlights the importance of dimensional analysis in simplifying complex physical problems.
chewwy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Just read this, and got a bit confused when trying to do it...

Homework Statement



We have a diffusion equation situation with a semi-infinite rod, so:

\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial t} = \lambda \frac{\partial^2 \theta }{\partial x^2 }

at infinity the rod is at some fixed temperature \theta_0, whilst at x=0, the temperature increases proportionally to time. write \theta(x,t)=\theta_0 + ktF.

explain with the help of dimensional analysis why F is a function only of the similarity variable \zeta = \frac{x}{\sqrt{\lambda t}}, and is independent of \theta_0 and k.

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, right... so F must be dimensionless. but we have five variables here - \theta_0 , x, t, \lambda , k. how do we show \theta_0 and k aren't involved?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can get to the fact that F must be a function of (\frac{\theta_0}{kt})^a (\frac{x}{\sqrt{\lambda t}})^b

but then I'm stuck...
 
this is almost certainly wrong but if \theta_0 has units of temperature and t has units seconds and k is of units Ks^{-1} then \frac{\theta_0}{kt} has units \frac{K}{Ks^{-1}s} which all cancel so that's just a constant, then you have

F = C \zeta^b with C a constant. Don't you?
 
latentcorpse said:
this is almost certainly wrong but if \theta_0 has units of temperature and t has units seconds and k is of units Ks^{-1} then \frac{\theta_0}{kt} has units \frac{K}{Ks^{-1}s} which all cancel so that's just a constant, then you have

F = C \zeta^b with C a constant. Don't you?

just because a quantity is dimensionless does not make it constant - it's a function of t!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top