Why is graphene only a recent discovery?

Doofy
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
We've been making things out of graphite for ages, which certainly has its uses, but interest in graphene has just started to take off recently. It's hailed as a miracle material and it seems that it was right under our noses all along - how come it took such a long time to be discovered?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Although graphene was well studied, because all mathematical studies for carbon nanotubes and flullerene (C60) start from the graphene sheet, it came late.
There were some tries to produce it but with no success.

Some people may say that this is because there were a limiting belief around that stated that it was no possible to have a stable 2D crystal structure as it will immediately fold or roll up.
 
Also, in order to study graphene you need pretty good instrumentation and many of the techniques used have only been widely available for 15-20 years. It is easy to forget that e.g. all the SPM techniques were invented in the 80s.
I am not sure how long micro-raman has been around.

Furthermore, making graphene is stilll not easy if you want large sheets, there are only a handful of groups around the world that can grow good quality single layer graphene.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top