Why is gravity the only force the causes time dilation?

soothsayer
Messages
422
Reaction score
5
We all know that in general relativity, there is the idea that the gravitational force and accelerating reference frames are very closely related. In GR, gravity acts through distortions of the space-time continuum, which causes phenomena such as redshift and time dilation.

My question is this: how come the electromagnetic and nuclear forces aren't thought of along the same lines? What experiment could we do to determine the difference between an accelerating frame and a frame acted on by a uniform electric field? How come the other forces aren't thought of as being caused by some distortion of space and time, yielding things such as electromagnetic time dilation? Does it have to do with gravity's ability to attract all things with energy, regardless of charge, flavor, color, etc.? Lastly, whatever this fundamental difference is that separates gravity from the rest in these regards, how are they handled in current attempts at unified field theories?

Thanks for humoring me!
- Sooth
 
Physics news on Phys.org
soothsayer said:
My question is this: how come the electromagnetic and nuclear forces aren't thought of along the same lines? What experiment could we do to determine the difference between an accelerating frame and a frame acted on by a uniform electric field?

An electric field does not impart the same acceleration to all objects; for example, it doesn't affect electrically neutral objects at all, so it is trivial to distinguish a uniform electric field from an accelerating frame, since neutral objects will behave differently in the two cases.

In other words, the fundamental difference between gravity and the other forces is that gravity imparts the same acceleration to all objects, because it couples to energy, which is also what determines inertia. That is, the property of objects which determines how strongly they respond to gravity is the same property that determines how strongly they resist being accelerated. That's not true for the other forces.

soothsayer said:
How come the other forces aren't thought of as being caused by some distortion of space and time

Because of the above difference between gravity and the other forces. It's the fact that gravity imparts the same acceleration to all objects that makes the interpretation of gravity as spacetime curvature possible.
 
Thanks, PeterDonis. I think I was trying to convince myself of what you just said in my original post, but I couldn't think of it quite this concisely. It didn't really seem like a very strong argument until I read this:

PeterDonis said:
That is, the property of objects which determines how strongly they respond to gravity is the same property that determines how strongly they resist being accelerated. That's not true for the other forces.

That was kind of an "aha!" moment.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top