In classical mechanics, I can measure the inertial mass of a particle by measuring force and acceleration: m=F/a. In QM, this equation only holds for expectation values <F> and <a>. Does this lead to the fact that inertial mass is not an observable?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Is there a deeper underlying principle which determines if a classical observable has a quantum mechanical analogue? Like, it must be obtainable by some kind of "direct" measurement?

For example, I'd guess that moment of inertia is not an observable in QM since mathematically, it is very similar to inertial mass. Also, time isn't an observable, but this is probably a different case (see the other thread).

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Why is inertial mass not an observable in QM?

Loading...

Similar Threads for inertial mass observable |
---|

B Black hole emits quantum particles from the mass sucked in? |

I Dirac's Rest Mass in Minowski Spacetime |

A Scalar Fields with the Same Mass |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**