Why is it important to match frequency to timescale of events?

AI Thread Summary
Matching frequency to the timescale of events is crucial for accurately detecting fluctuations, as an inappropriate timescale can obscure results or disturb the phenomena being measured. Using electromagnetic radiation, higher frequencies can yield more precise position readings but may also interfere with the dynamics of the particles being observed. A specific example from a study on superconductivity suggests that the strongest detection of fluctuations occurs when the probing frequency aligns with the fluctuation frequency. This alignment may indicate a resonant effect, enhancing the measurement's sensitivity to small-scale fluctuations. Understanding the probe's functioning and its interaction with the material is essential for interpreting these results effectively.
swooshfactory
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I understand that too long of a time scale won't resolve an event clearly, and too much has the risk of exciting whatever you're trying to measure. Is there some sort of resonant effect when you match, say, a radiation frequency to the time of an event taking place? Specifically I'm applying this to detecting fluctuation phenomena.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on what you want to achieve - the usual approach is to choose the parameters to minimize your uncertainties.

I'm guessing you are thinking of something like using EM radiation to locate a particle - and you want to be able to measure small changes in position. To get a more accurate position reading, you need a higher frequency, but to-high-a frequency risks disturbing the dynamics you want to monitor?

But you could be referring to the frequency that data is collected.

Did you have a specific example in mind?
 
I do have a specfic example in mind...in http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.2097v1.pdf (Temporal correlations of superconductivity above the transition temperature in La2xSrxCuO4 probed by terahertz spectroscopy), they state that "We set the overall scale of so that the loss peak in Fig. 1c is exhibited at a temperature when the probing frequency equals the fluctuation frequency at that temperature." i.e. that at a particular frequency, the lossy fluctuation is identified the most strongly when the frequency of light used to measure the fluctuation matches the frequency of the fluctuation.
 
Hmmm ... it reads a lot like a fudge factor to me - however, it's enough outside my field that I may just not be familiar enough with the methodology. The other way I'd read it is that the probe is detecting what it does by getting a response from the material (a high-temp superconductor) and you intuition that some sort of resonance is involved would be reasonable. If the probe frequency is close to that of the small-scale fluctuations, then these fluctuations would show up strongly. You want to look closely at exactly what is fluctuating, and how the probe works to detect it.
 
It is a bit of a fudge factor, and that's acknowledged by the authors. But I'm not sure what about it would be resonating...
 
Me neither - I just skimmed it.
Find out how the probe part works.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top