Why is it so hard to explain friction?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Almada R
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain Friction Hard
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the complexities and challenges of explaining friction in physics. Participants explore the nature of friction, its molecular underpinnings, and the difficulties in creating predictive models. The conversation touches on theoretical and conceptual aspects of friction, as well as its implications in practical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that while friction influences movement in Newtonian Mechanics, there is uncertainty about its fundamental nature.
  • Another participant challenges this view, asserting that friction is well understood and requests clarification on the initial claim.
  • A participant explains that friction is an average behavior arising from irregular surfaces at the molecular level, suggesting that complete atomic knowledge is necessary for detailed understanding.
  • Some participants draw parallels between the understanding of friction and gravity, implying that both concepts are often misunderstood.
  • There is mention of the empirical derivation of friction coefficients, indicating a lack of a universally useful predictive model.
  • Another participant emphasizes the complexity of friction, noting that it involves multiple microscopic processes and various material interactions.
  • A participant discusses the confusion surrounding the direction of friction forces, particularly in the context of accelerating vehicles, suggesting that misconceptions arise from oversimplified rules.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the understanding of friction, with some asserting that it is well understood while others highlight the complexities and uncertainties involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the fundamental nature of friction and the adequacy of existing models.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the understanding of friction is complicated by factors such as material properties, microscopic processes, and the empirical nature of friction coefficients. There is no consensus on whether this indicates a fundamental lack of understanding or simply the complexity of the problem.

Almada R
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
While in class, my Thermodynamics professor came up with an interesting fact, that neither I nor my colleagues were ever aware of: While you may have heard that friction influenciates the movement in Newtonian Mechanics, no one really knows what friction is.
And so I have been wandering why it is so hard to explain something that is so natural to us? What are the physics behind this? Hope you can help clarify my doubt.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Err, what? As far as I am aware, we know exactly what friction is. Can you elaborate a bit on what you mean?
 
Friction is an average behavior. At the molecular level, surfaces are very irregular. Stressing a crystal lattice by pushing it, is a molecular level problem.

I think what the professor meant, is that without complete knowledge of the atoms in the materials, we can not have detailed knowledge of the forces.

In particle physics, quantum mechanics and Newton's laws apply and there is no friction.

But on a macro level, the average behavior is very well described by friction.
 
Yeah, just like people say no one really knows what gravity is. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50, Bystander and davenn
Another "I don't understand it so nobody understands it" thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
anorlunda said:
I think what the professor meant, is that without complete knowledge of the atoms in the materials, we can not have detailed knowledge of the forces.
Or that we don't have a useful general predictive model for friction coefficients. We usually derive them empirically, without knowing/caring what actually happens on the microscopic level.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Almada R and sophiecentaur
A.T. said:
Or that we don't have a useful general predictive model for friction coefficients.

The key word is "useful". There certainly is a working microscopic model. It's complicated because what we call "friction" corresponds to multiple microscopic processes. It's complicated because even in simple systems many different materials are involved: a piece of aluminum can have aluminum, three different oxides, and many different contaminants, all contributing. It's complicated because you have grain boundaries, orientations, and, and, and...

But this is saying that this is a complex problem, not that there is a fundamental lack of understanding. Nobody would say we don't understand atomic physics just because we can't calculate the color of lead (82 electrons) from the Schroedinger Equation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aaron Crowl, Almada R, russ_watters and 1 other person
One aspect of friction that seems to confuse a lot of people is how to decide on the direction that a friction force is acting. When a car is accelerating, people have a problem with the fact that it's friction between wheels and ground that drives the car forward and yet we say that friction slows things down. But that's because people want to apply a simple rule to every situation without thinking it through. It's not a problem really.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Almada R

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
13K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
37K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
11K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
6K