Why is Light Rectilinear? Explaining Its Acceptance

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AstrophysicsX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of why light is considered to travel in straight lines, known as rectilinear propagation. Participants explore theoretical explanations, historical context, and phenomena such as diffraction that may challenge this notion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that light is accepted as rectilinear due to its nature as a transverse wave, where energy flow is perpendicular to the electric and magnetic fields, suggesting it must move in straight lines.
  • Others introduce the concept of diffraction, questioning how this phenomenon fits into the rectilinear model of light propagation.
  • One participant notes that the E and H fields are only perpendicular to energy flow in the 'far field' and that obstacles can disturb these fields, leading to diffraction and a need for the fields to stabilize.
  • Another perspective highlights that the term "rectilinear" was historically used to explain the formation of shadows, implying that the concept may have historical roots rather than being purely physical.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the rectilinear nature of light, with some supporting the idea based on wave properties while others challenge it through the lens of diffraction. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

The discussion touches on the limitations of definitions regarding rectilinear propagation and the conditions under which light behaves differently, such as in the presence of obstacles, but does not resolve these complexities.

AstrophysicsX
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Explain why it's accepted that light is rectilinear. It doesn't really seem like it.
 
Science news on Phys.org
AstrophysicsX said:
Explain why it's accepted that light is rectilinear. It doesn't really seem like it.
Details? What is your objection?
 
well its a transverse wave - the direction of energy flow is always perpendicular to the plane containing the e-field and b-field, so the energy has to move in a straight line, albeit infinitely many straight lines.
 
What about diffraction?
 
The E and H fields are only at right angles to the energy flow in the 'far field'. When you introduce an obstacle, the fields are disturbed (diffraction) and need to travel a reasonable distance to settle down again. The term Rectilinear was originally to describe the fact that you see shadows. I don't think there's really any conflict here - just a bit of history.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K