Why Is My Covariant Derivative Result Incorrect?

Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
I will take the differential form of position vector r:

##\vec{r}=r\hat{r}##

##d\vec{r}=dr\hat{r}+rd\hat{r}##

So, now I need find ##d\hat{r}##

##d\hat{r}=\frac{d\hat{r}}{dr}dr+\frac{d\hat{r}}{d\theta}d\theta##

##\frac{d\hat{r}}{dr}=\Gamma ^{r}_{rr}\hat{r}+\Gamma ^{\theta}_{rr}\hat{\theta}=0\hat{r}+0\hat{\theta}=\vec{0}##

##\frac{d\hat{r}}{d\theta}=\Gamma ^{r}_{r\theta}\hat{r}+\Gamma ^{\theta}_{r\theta}\hat{\theta}=0\hat{r}+\frac{1}{r}\hat{\theta}=\frac{1}{r}\hat{\theta}##

So...

##d\hat{r}=\vec{0}dr+\frac{1}{r}\hat{\theta}d\theta=\frac{1}{r}d\theta \hat{\theta}##

Resulting in:

##d\vec{r}=dr\hat{r}+r\frac{1}{r}d\theta \hat{\theta}=dr\hat{r}+d\theta \hat{\theta}##

So, I have 2 question:

1) What the theory of covariant derivative has to do with this? Why I need understand covariante derivative? Where it appears? What expression it simplifies?
To understand the christofell's symbols is necessary because it appears in the process. But I don't see the covariant derivative in process...

2) Why my result is ##d\vec{r}=dr\hat{r}+d\theta \hat{\theta}##? It's wrong! Because ##d\vec{r}=dr\hat{r}+rd\theta \hat{\theta}## (with a factor r in 2nd term). However, I did all computation correctly. Where is the wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need Christoffel symbols to take derivatives on curved surfaces. Therefore they appear whenever you're varying any quantity in a curved space. It should look like this for differentiating covariant terms, \nabla_\mu x^\nu = \partial_\mu x^\nu + \Gamma_{\mu \alpha}^\nu x^\alpha and \nabla_\mu x_\nu = \partial_\mu x_\nu - \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\alpha x_\alpha for contravariant terms.
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...
Back
Top