Why Is My Guitar String Frequency Calculation Different from the Model Answer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Philip Wong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Velocity
Philip Wong
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


string on a guitar is plucked to excites 3 harmonic.
length = 0.3m.
tension = 100N
linear mass density (mu) = 0.1 kg/m
calculate its frequency
My friend and I wants to find the frequency using the above information. I think we use different approach, but came to the same solution. YET when we compare it with model answers, it is WRONG (i.e. the model answer is 316Hz) can someone explain why? or was the model answer WRONG? (note: it is an known fact that the model answer is occasionally found to be wrong)

thanks!

Homework Equations


velocity = sqrt (T/mu)
L = 3/2 lambda i.e. lambda = (2/3) * L
velocity = lambda * frequency i.e. frequency = velocity/lambda

The Attempt at a Solution



velocity = sqrt(100/.1) =31.6 m/s
lambda = (2/3) * 0.3m = 0.2
frequency = 1/0.2 * 31.6 = 158Hz

the answer I got correlates with the answer a friend got too, but is was off by almost 200Hz when compare to model answer. SO it is definitely not due to rounding error.

Was we wrong? or was model answer wrong?

thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You and your friend are correct and the model answer is wrong. If you do it symbolically, the nth string harmonic frequency is given by

f_n=\frac{n}{2L}\sqrt{T/\mu}

Your answer is exactly half the model answer, so whoever wrote the model answer probably forgot to divide by 2.
 
kuruman said:
You and your friend are correct and the model answer is wrong. If you do it symbolically, the nth string harmonic frequency is given by

f_n=\frac{n}{2L}\sqrt{T/\mu}

Your answer is exactly half the model answer, so whoever wrote the model answer probably forgot to divide by 2.

thanks!
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top