Why is my Sondhauss tube not producing any sound?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cyberdiver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound Tube
AI Thread Summary
The Sondhauss tube setup involves a 17-cm Pyrex test tube and steel wool as the stack, but it is not producing sound despite following similar methods seen in demonstrations. The discussion recalls past attempts with a steel tube and wire gauze, which occasionally produced a brief noise, highlighting the importance of the plug's position within the tube for sound production. The effectiveness of different materials, such as gauze versus steel wool, is also noted as potentially significant. The lack of sound in the current setup raises questions about the specific conditions required for successful operation. Understanding the nuances of tube length, plug material, and placement may be key to achieving the desired sound.
cyberdiver
Messages
23
Reaction score
3
I've been trying to make a Sondhauss tube lately. My setup is a 17-cm long Pyrex test tube with a small piece of steel wool as the stack. I've been holding the closed end over a gas stove on full heat with a pipe wrench, but absolutely no sound is produced. What I am doing seems to be no different from other demonstrations online, so why is this so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That question takes me back. I remember trying this nearly twenty years ago, using a steel tube (probably 30mm bore) with a wire gauze plug inside it. It was never very successful but it sometimes produced a short lived groaning noise, I seem to remember. I used gauze and not steel wool ( I thought that was supposed to be important) and the tube was about a half metre long - or more. I did find that the actual position of the plug in the tube was very relevant to performance (what there was of it).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top