Why Is My Thevenin Resistance Calculation Different from the Textbook's?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the Thevenin resistance of a given circuit. The original poster notes a discrepancy between their calculated result and the textbook answer, prompting exploration of the circuit's configuration and the role of various resistors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the inclusion of specific resistors in the Thevenin equivalent calculation, particularly questioning whether R4 should be considered. There are differing opinions on the configuration of R2 and R3, with some suggesting they are in parallel while others argue they are in series.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with several participants providing insights and questioning assumptions about the circuit's components and their interactions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to consider the effects of active sources in the analysis.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the circuit's complexity due to multiple power sources, which may require the application of Kirchhoff's laws and simultaneous equations for a thorough analysis. The clarity of the circuit diagram is also noted as a potential issue affecting the discussion.

Questions999
Messages
151
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We have the circuit.http://i.imgur.com/X4IYi4j.jpg
Find the equivalent thevenin resistance ..the result in my book is 8 ohm but I alway get 8/6 ..how so?

Homework Equations


Thevenin Teorem


The Attempt at a Solution



1/Re=1/4+1/2 and so Re=8/6 ..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll have to show your work so we can see where you are going wrong. Is R4 part of the circuit for which you want to find the Thevenin equivalent, or does it represent the load?
 
I don't calculate R4 because I have to use the Tevenin's transformation between the points a and b..to find equivalent resistance, I took the R3 and R2 in parallel and found 1/Re=1/R3+ 1/R2
 
I get R thevenin = 80/21 ohms. I included R4.

Without R4 I get R thevenin = 5 ohms.
 
Last edited:
Elaia06 said:
I don't calculate R4 because I have to use the Tevenin's transformation between the points a and b..to find equivalent resistance, I took the R3 and R2 in parallel and found 1/Re=1/R3+ 1/R2

So R4 is not part of the circuit under analysis. Fine.

What makes you think that R2 and R3 are in parallel? Even if you could suppress the two current sources (which you can't because one of them is an active source), wouldn't that leave the resistors in series?

You'll have to use another method to find the Thevenin equivalent since you have an active source in the circuit.
 
Rude man,how about without R4?
I they are in series,than the result is 6 ,still different from my book..
 
Elaia06 said:
Rude man,how about without R4?
I they are in series,than the result is 6 ,still different from my book..

The controlled source is going to muck with the Thevenin resistance. You need another analysis method.

@rude man: I'm seeing the book's answer of 8Ω.
 
Elaia06 said:
Rude man,how about without R4?
I they are in series,than the result is 6 ,still different from my book..

As gneill pointed out, you have to include the effects of the voltage-dependent voltage source. You can't just parallel resistors etc.

The way I do it is to apply 1V to the input, then compute the input current i using KVL or whatever, then R thevenin = 1/i.
 
gneill said:
The controlled source is going to muck with the Thevenin resistance. You need another analysis method.

@rude man: I'm seeing the book's answer of 8Ω.

Looks like I struck out on this one! :blushing:
 
  • #10
rude man said:
Looks like I struck out on this one! :blushing:

Hey, you do good work. A small slip every now and then can't be avoided. Besides, they tend to rejuvenate concentration :smile:
 
  • #11
gneill said:
Hey, you do good work. A small slip every now and then can't be avoided. Besides, they tend to rejuvenate concentration :smile:

Still bugs me. Want to send me your analysis privately?
 
  • #12
rude man said:
Still bugs me. Want to send me your analysis privately?

Sure, I'll see if I can slip it into a PM.
 
  • #13
Elaia06 said:

Homework Statement

i'm disappointed that you appear to have given up on this question. I seem to have worked it out needlessly, then. :smile:

Perhaps someone else would like clues on how to do it? It's a good exam-type question. :wink:
 
  • #14
The circuit isn't very clear but if there's 2 power sources then Kirchhoff's voltage law and the use of simultaneous equations would be helpful
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K