Why is natural log abbreviated as ln and not nl ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The abbreviation for natural logarithm is "ln," derived from the Latin term "logarithmus naturalis." This notation was first attributed to Irving Stringham in 1893, marking its introduction into mathematical literature. Despite speculation about its meaning, no definitive explanation exists for the abbreviation "ln." Stringham's work established "ln" as the standard notation in the mathematical community, which has persisted to this day.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions
  • Familiarity with Latin terminology in mathematics
  • Knowledge of historical mathematical notation
  • Basic calculus concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context of mathematical notation changes
  • Explore the contributions of Irving Stringham to mathematics
  • Learn about the significance of logarithms in calculus
  • Investigate the influence of Latin on modern mathematical language
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students of calculus, and anyone interested in the history of mathematical notation.

sheldonrocks97
Gold Member
Messages
66
Reaction score
2
Why is natural log abbreviated as "ln" and not "nl"?

I've been taking calculus for a while now and I was just wondering why natural logarithm is abbreviated as "ln" and not "nl". I'm just curious!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are many languages that place adjectives after nouns.. I highly doubt the idea was first published in English.
 
Hmm... interesting. I actually heard it was from Latin, but I just randomly saw that on the internet.
 
Latin has adjectives after nouns.
 
sheldonrocks97 said:
I actually heard it was from Latin, but I just randomly saw that on the internet.
Exactly. The "natural logarithm" in English is the logarithmus naturalis in Latin. Back in the day, it was Latin rather than English that was the lingua franca of the technical community.
 
1MileCrash said:
Latin has adjectives after nouns.
That post must be your magnum opus. :-p

But it's true, Latin has not much in the way of word order. Either way is usually just as good as the other.
 
1MileCrash said:
There are many languages that place adjectives after nouns.. I highly doubt the idea was first published in English.

The idea, no. But the notation, yes. The first use of ln is attributed to New York-born Irving Stringham in 1983. This is beyond historical doubt. Nobody has ever found an earlier use of the notation. Stringham got his degree from Harvard and was a professor of math at Berkeley. The notation ln is an American invention all the way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irving_Stringham

The truth of the matter is that nobody knows what ln is intended to mean. Nobody ever wrote down "ln stands for logarithmus naturalis," or "ln stands for Napier's logarithm," or any other explanation. All definitive answers in this thread are idle speculation. Stringham never bothered to explain it.

See also

http://www.pballew.net/arithme1.html#ln for a detailed account of the terminology and notation. That page shows an excerpt from Stringham's 1893 book, in which he states that the natural logarithm is notated "ln" without providing any explanation at all. Could be Latin, could be for Napier, could be anything.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
SteveL27 said:
The first use of ln is attributed to New York-born Irving Stringham in 1983.

Typo. You mean 1893 when, as you say, his book was published. Good post though.
 
In portuguese (my idioma) we speak Logaritmo natural (ln)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
663
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K