Why Is Phosphor Emission Duration Crucial in TV Screen Design?

AI Thread Summary
The duration of phosphor light emission is critical in TV screen design because it affects image stability and quality. A longer emission duration can reduce flicker, enhancing viewer comfort and reducing eye strain. This relates to the concept of "flicker fusion frequency," which is the point at which a flickering light source is perceived as steady. Understanding this factor is essential for creating screens that provide a smooth viewing experience. Overall, phosphor emission duration plays a vital role in the overall performance and user experience of television displays.
HelloKitty_1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why is the length of time over which a phosphor emits light an imporant factor to consider when designing a television screen?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have gone over the last three chapters in my textbook for the answer. I even drove to the library to try to get some more understanding of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HelloKitty_1 said:

Homework Statement



Why is the length of time over which a phosphor emits light an imporant factor to consider when designing a television screen?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have gone over the last three chapters in my textbook for the answer. I even drove to the library to try to get some more understanding of it.

Welcome to the PF.

Hint -- use the search term "flicker fusion frequency".
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

How Many Photons Hit Your Retina from a Distant Light Source?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Why Can't Math Teaching Be More Like Computer Science?
Replies
25
Views
17K
I Progress In Calculating The HLbL Contribution To Muon g-2
Replies
0
Views
2K
What if Gravity could be controlled?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Focus all of your ire on me, if you would
Replies
4
Views
2K
Why can’t decay heat be harnessed to safely shutdown a nuclear reactor?
Replies
14
Views
10K
Why can't I get Stoke's Theorem to Work ?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I What Key Issues Should Cosmologists Address in the ΛCDM Model?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Terrell Revisited: The Invisibility of the Lorentz Contraction
4
Replies
184
Views
22K
Meet jtbell: Meet a Mentor Series Interview
Replies
12
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top