Why is the 2-norm of A^k equal to 2-norm of T^k?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vabamyyr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
vabamyyr
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Let Q^H * A * Q = T = D + N be Schur decomposition of A. D is a diagonal matrix with eigenvalues of A and N is strictly upper triangular matrix. This sentence is used in a proof which I am not going to state but at some point it states that ||A^k|| 2 norm = ||T^k|| 2 norm for k>=0. I don't understand
where this equality comes from. I tried to work this equality out with an example of taking
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can help yourself, and us, by using the latex formatting in this forum to make it clear what it is you're asking. Note the text in the reply box is not formatted literally.
 
The problem is simple: why is the 2-norm of A^k equal to 2-norm of T^k?
 

Thread 'Trouble understanding an online solution to an exercise in Dummit & Foote'

##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Thread 'Decomposition into irreps of compact Lie group'

When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Question from a proof in Axler 2nd Ed, 'Linear Algebra Done Right'
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Proof by induction of block diagonal decomposition of a matrix
Replies
4
Views
1K
A The meaning of ##(ict, x_1,x_2,x_3)##
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Proving SL_2(C) Homeomorphic to SU(2)xT & Simple Connectedness
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Uniqueness of reduced row echelon form (proof verification)
Replies
4
Views
1K
Norm indueced by a matrix with eigenvalues bigger than 1
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Can't understand a step in an LU decomposition proof
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Proof that if T is Hermitian, eigenvectors form an orthonormal basis
Replies
3
Views
3K
I Proving inequality about dimension of quotient vector spaces
Replies
25
Views
3K
A Is parallel transport exactly norm-preserving or only approximately?
Replies
21
Views
973

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top