Why is the adoption of HT superconductors so slow despite their advantages?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Art
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superconductors
AI Thread Summary
The slow adoption of high-temperature superconductors (HTS) is primarily due to their low current density and critical current limitations compared to conventional superconductors. While HTS materials like YBCO operate at temperatures around 92K, challenges such as migrating vortices in magnetic fields and increased AC resistivity at elevated temperatures hinder their efficiency. Although they offer significant advantages, including higher efficiency and reduced cooling costs with liquid nitrogen, practical applications remain limited, especially in high-current scenarios. Recent advancements in fabrication technology may improve their viability, but significant hurdles still exist. The ongoing research into HTS continues to yield valuable insights into superconductivity physics.
Art
Given that HTSC cables have been commercially available for some time now why has the uptake of this technology been so slow. Even allowing for the extra cost I'd have thought the advantages such as 140x the current carrying capacity, far higher efficiency etc. would outway any possible disadvantages?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
how high a temp are we talking about..?
 
willib said:
how high a temp are we talking about..?
I believe around 40K which is the big advantage over LTS which require cooling to 10K. Thus instead of requiring liquid helium which is expensive they use liquid nitrogen which is cheaper than bottled water. As I understand it the coolant is built into the cable in some permanent way.
 
Art said:
I believe around 40K which is the big advantage over LTS which require cooling to 10K. Thus instead of requiring liquid helium which is expensive they use liquid nitrogen which is cheaper than bottled water. As I understand it the coolant is built into the cable in some permanent way.

Er.. no. LN2 has a boiling point of 77 K. So the operating temperature will have that as the maximum Tc for the superconductor to use LN2 has a coolant.

HTS such as YBCO has Tc of around 92 K. So this isn't the problem. The problem with most HTS is that it has a low current density, and so a low critical current density, beyond which, it becomes normal, when compared to conventional superconductors. Furthermore, as a Type II superconductor, there's problem with migrating vortices and flux lines when there's any significant magnetic fields (as there usually is when there's current carrying conductors or if it is placed in RF fields). These tend to cause many parts of the superconductor to not be superconducting.

One should also note that the higher the operating temperature, the less the density of supercurrent there is in the superconductor. What this means is that even if one is still below Tc, at elevated temperature, there will be more normal-state charge carriers present than at very low temperature close to 0K. While the DC resistivity of the superconductor will still be zero (since any potential applied will be "shorted" by the supercurrent), the AC resistivity of ANY superconductor is not zero. Here, the normal charge carriers/electrons also participate in the AC resistivity. So if you have a larger density of normal electrons at elevated temperatures, even if you're still in the superconducting state, you still lose power in AC transmission. For HTS, this is made worse because it is not a good normal state conductor in the first place - all HTS are doped ceramics.

This, among other things, have made the technological application of HTS very challenging.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Er.. no. LN2 has a boiling point of 77 K. So the operating temperature will have that as the maximum Tc for the superconductor to use LN2 has a coolant.

HTS such as YBCO has Tc of around 92 K. So this isn't the problem. The problem with most HTS is that it has a low current density, and so a low critical current density, beyond which, it becomes normal, when compared to conventional superconductors. Furthermore, as a Type II superconductor, there's problem with migrating vortices and flux lines when there's any significant magnetic fields (as there usually is when there's current carrying conductors or if it is placed in RF fields). These tend to cause many parts of the superconductor to not be superconducting.

One should also note that the higher the operating temperature, the less the density of supercurrent there is in the superconductor. What this means is that even if one is still below Tc, at elevated temperature, there will be more normal-state charge carriers present than at very low temperature close to 0K. While the DC resistivity of the superconductor will still be zero (since any potential applied will be "shorted" by the supercurrent), the AC resistivity of ANY superconductor is not zero. Here, the normal charge carriers/electrons also participate in the AC resistivity. So if you have a larger density of normal electrons at elevated temperatures, even if you're still in the superconducting state, you still lose power in AC transmission. For HTS, this is made worse because it is not a good normal state conductor in the first place - all HTS are doped ceramics.

This, among other things, have made the technological application of HTS very challenging.

Zz.
Thanks Zz,
I misread the article, it referred to the first HTS material discovered operating at 40K but the critical temperature for the material they are using is 108K. :blushing: Where I am coming from is I was looking at a company as an investment opportunity and I wondered why if they had what reads like such dream products they weren't flying out the door. For example their literature boasts of ships engines they're developing for the US navy 1/4 the size and 1/5 the weight of equal power conventional engines. It sounded too good to be true :smile: .
With current technology limitations do you think it is likely the applications for superconducting products will always be limited or would straightforward solutions such as RF shielding around the cable alleviate some of the problems you described?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Art said:
With current technology limitations do you think it is likely the applications for superconducting products will always be limited or would straightforward solutions such as RF shielding around the cable alleviate some of the problems you described?

There have been limited applications of HTS - I think cell phone stations use them in some form or another. Any application that doesn't require a large current would tend to be more suitable. However, unless they can make major progress in the fabrication technology (and recent developements appear to make headway), the use of HTS will be technologically hampered by the limitations I've mentioned.

From my perspective, as a physicist, the physics of HTS is more interesting since that has been what I've focused on. Even if we solve the technological issue, I don't think we'll ever see the end of new and exciting physics coming out of the study of HTS.

Zz.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top