Why is the arXiv link causing issues in the Links Database?

  • Thread starter Thread starter quantumdude
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The Links Database is experiencing issues with "arxiv.org" links, resulting in a "status unknown" error despite the links functioning correctly. This problem is significant due to the high volume of arXiv links being added to the database. Users are reporting consistent failures when attempting to populate the database with these links. The discussion highlights the need for a resolution to ensure proper functionality. Addressing this issue is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the Links Database.
quantumdude
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,560
Reaction score
24
Greg,

I've been busily populating the Links Database with all our Napster links, and have found that the database chokes everytime I feed it an "arxiv.org" link. It comes up as "status unknown". The links work OK, but it seems like something is wrong. Since so many of the links are from the arXiv, it seems like it's worth bringing up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
*bumpity-bump*
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top