Why Is the Electric Field Inside a Conductor Zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the principle that the electric field inside a conductor is zero in electrostatic conditions, where charges are stationary. It highlights confusion regarding problems involving uniformly charged spheres, emphasizing that while charges in a conductor move to the surface, this does not apply to non-conducting spheres. The distinction is made that the zero electric field applies strictly to conductors under electrostatic conditions, without current flow. The conversation clarifies that the presence of current introduces an electric field, which is not relevant in the context of electrostatics. Overall, the key takeaway is that the zero electric field principle applies specifically to conductors in electrostatic equilibrium.
planesinspace
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I seem to be having trouble grasping a very basic principle in electromagnetism. I have been told, in numerous places, that the electric field inside a conductor is zero. (Electrostatics). Yet I keep coming across problems in the textbook like this one:

"Use Gauss's Law to find the electric field inside a uniformly charged sphere (charge density 'ro')."

where for Q[enclosed] = charge density * volume

However, don't all the charges move to the surface of the sphere? and the electric field IN the sphere is subsequently zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
uniformly charged sphere =/= conductor in all cases.
 
the electric field inside a conductor is zero. (Electrostatics).

Yes this is true so long as there is not current flowing - all charges are stationary.

As soon as a current flows there is a field.
 
Studiot said:
Yes this is true so long as there is not current flowing - all charges are stationary.

As soon as a current flows there is a field.

The OP did indicate that this is Electrostatics. So there is no need to make such qualification.

Feldoh has sufficiently answered the question here, that just because one has a spherical charge, it doesn't mean that one also has a conducting sphere.

Zz.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top