Why Is the Enthalpy of Formation for NaCl Less Negative Than for KCl?

  • Thread starter Thread starter babita
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formation Kcl
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the enthalpy of formation (ΔHf) for NaCl being less negative than that for KCl, despite the expectation that Na+, being smaller than K+, would create stronger electrostatic attractions with Cl-. Participants express confusion over this observation, as stronger attractions should theoretically lead to a more negative ΔHf for NaCl. The conversation also touches on the contrasting behavior observed with fluorine compounds, where the reasoning appears consistent. The need for clarification on the underlying principles affecting these enthalpy values is emphasized. Understanding the factors influencing ionic bonding and lattice energy is crucial for resolving this discrepancy.
babita
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In my book it is given that ΔHffor NaCl is less negative than that for KCl.
I'm not able to understand that...I think that electrostatic attractions between Na+ and Cl- will be stronger than K+ & Cl- as Na has smaller size than K...in its formation more energy should be released and ΔHffor NaCl should be more negative.

I also noticed that in case of F my reasoning seems correct.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
please reply someone...thanks
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top