Suggestion Why is the math output hard to read sometimes?

  1. May I suggest improving the format of the math output in the forum.

    Consider the following code:

    [tex]
    \mathop\textnormal{Res}\limits_{z=-n}\left\{\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=(-x)^n,\quad n=0,-1,-2,\cdots
    [/tex]

    The equal sign is not well displayed under the Res symbol and the "s" in sine is broken up. I've noticed other problems like this in general. I think PF would look more polished if the math output was nicer looking.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. If I recall correctly, it used to be better. I'm not sure when or why the change occurred.
     
  4. DrGreg

    DrGreg 1,977
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I suspect the problem might be that the LaTeX renderer (which generates the equation images) may work on the assumption that the equations will be displayed on a white background. On a grey background, some of the pixels are too faint. Is it possible to tweak the LaTeX renderer to take account of the grey background?
     
  5. chroot

    chroot 10,426
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Hey all,

    A year ago or so, something changed in the fonts included in the normal LaTeX distributions that come with most Linux distributions. Along with it were a number of other changes that broke PF's latex system. I rewrote some of it, but never really figured out the problem with the fonts.

    I will look into it more. I don't actually think it has anything to do with anti-aliasing. The images are currently anti-aliased to white, and then white is dropped out as transparent. If the strokes look correct when anti-aliased to white, it seems that changing the surrounding white pixels to transparent would not affect them. It's worth a shot, though.

    - Warren
     
  6. DrGreg

    DrGreg 1,977
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    For what it's worth, I took the PNG image in post #1, on its default white background, and decreased the brightness until its background matched this thread's grey background. I think the result (attached) is therefore what you'd get if anti-aliased to grey. Slightly more legible, I think, but still not great, and I guess that's down to a poor choice of font. Or something.
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Moonbear

    Moonbear 12,265
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Can the font be made bold, either in a default setting or when typed by the user (I never use LaTex, so don't know the ins and outs of this)? It just looks like the font is a bit thin and loses something, so if there's a way to make it bold, that might be enough to improve readability.
     
  8. DrGreg

    DrGreg 1,977
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    That wouldn't be a solution as such, because some equations use both bold and plain font, e.g.

    [tex]\mathbf{z} = a\mathbf{x} + b\mathbf{y}[/tex]​

    although personally I prefer

    [tex]\textbf{z} = a\textbf{x} + b\textbf{y}[/tex]​

    However, if you have a greater choice of font weights than just "plain" and "bold", then some slightly heavier fonts might help.
     
  9. chroot

    chroot 10,426
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Okay, guys... I changed some of the antialiasing behavior in Ghostscript (I turned it down!), and I think the output looks a little better now. If you could, post some troublesome LaTeX here and see if it renders better now.

    - Warren
     
  10. chroot

    chroot 10,426
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    [tex]

    \mathop\textnormal{Res}\limits_{z=-n}\left\{\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=(-x)^n,\quad n=0,-1,-2,\cdots

    [/tex]
     
  11. CRGreathouse

    CRGreathouse 3,682
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    [tex]\sum_{n=a}^bf(n)[/tex] has a very strong summation symbol.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. chroot

    chroot 10,426
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This is how it looked with the old antialiasing options:

    [tex]
    \sum_{n=a}^bf(n)
    [/tex]

    - Warren
     
  13. chroot

    chroot 10,426
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    And now the new:

    [tex]
    \sum_{n=a}^bf(n)
    [/tex]

    It's really strange that antialiasing options could even cause this in the first place.....

    - Warren
     
  14. chroot

    chroot 10,426
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    And with no anti-aliasing at all:

    [tex]
    \sum_{n=a}^bf(n)
    [/tex]

    - Warren
     
  15. chroot

    chroot 10,426
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Fooling around some more:

    [tex]
    \sum_{n=a}^bf(n)
    [/tex]
     
  16. chroot

    chroot 10,426
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Hmmm...

    [tex]
    \sum_{n=a}^bf(n)
    [/tex]
     
  17. chroot

    chroot 10,426
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Try try again:

    [tex]
    \sum_{n=a}^bf(n)
    [/tex]
     
  18. chroot

    chroot 10,426
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    [tex]

    \mathop\textnormal{Res}\limits_{z=-n}\left\{\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=(-x)^n,\quad n=0,-1,-2,\cdots

    [/tex]
     
  19. chroot

    chroot 10,426
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I'm not really sure I've found a solution. I'll have to keep hunting.

    [tex]

    \mathop\textnormal{Res}\limits_{z=-n}\left\{\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=(-x)^n,\quad n=0,-1,-2,\cdots

    [/tex]

    - Warren
     
  20. Moonbear

    Moonbear 12,265
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Some of those versions looked better...not perfect, but certainly better.
     
  21. Fredrik

    Fredrik 10,550
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    [tex]\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & \frac{u_x}{u} & \frac{u_y}{u}\\ 0 & -\frac{u_y}{u} & \frac{u_x}{u} \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

    Hm, both the parentheses and the zeroes look better than they did here. They used to look like the pixel size was bigger in the LaTeX font. I'm not a big fan of the new [tex]\sum[/tex] though, and x and y are still just barely legible. Have you tried a slightly bigger font size?

    It would also be nice if the \dot code would make a slightly bigger dot: [tex]\dot{\vec r}[/tex] (but I realize of course that you can't do anything that changes only that symbol).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thead via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?