Why is the new format necessary before differentiating?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsBoyMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 1K views
PhysicsBoyMan
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://postimage.org/]Screen_Shot_2015_10_27_at_9_16_09_PM.png[/PLAIN]
click image upload


Homework Equations


http://postimage.org/]Screen_Shot_2015_10_27_at_9_19_32_PM.png[/PLAIN]
free image upload


The Attempt at a Solution


So I wanted to differentiate B(t) by saying

B(t) = P(t)(1.05)20-t ln(1.05)

Apparently this is the wrong answer.

I'm supposed to change my function B(t) into this new form. From there I understand how they differentiated using the quotient rule. I can even understand how they got the new B(t) formula by splitting (1.05)20 from (1.05)-t, then changing that to 1/(1.05)t and multiplying by P(t).
http://postimage.org/]Screen_Shot_2015_10_27_at_9_58_05_PM.png[/PLAIN]
image hosting sites


What I don't understand is why my original attempt is wrong. Why is the new format necessary before we differentiate? It is because I have a negative exponent? Is it because I have two exponents?

Thanks for the help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsBoyMan said:

Homework Statement


Screen_Shot_2015_10_27_at_9_16_09_PM.png[/PLAIN]
click image upload


Homework Equations


Screen_Shot_2015_10_27_at_9_19_32_PM.png[/PLAIN]
free image upload


The Attempt at a Solution


So I wanted to differentiate B(t) by saying

B(t) = P(t)(1.05)20-t ln(1.05)

Apparently this is the wrong answer.
B(t) is defined as a product, but it doesn't seem that you used the product rule.
PhysicsBoyMan said:
I'm supposed to change my function B(t) into this new form. From there I understand how they differentiated using the quotient rule. I can even understand how they got the new B(t) formula by splitting (1.05)20 from (1.05)-t, then changing that to 1/(1.05)t and multiplying by P(t).
Screen_Shot_2015_10_27_at_9_58_05_PM.png[/PLAIN]
image hosting sites


What I don't understand is why my original attempt is wrong. Why is the new format necessary before we differentiate? It is because I have a negative exponent? Is it because I have two exponents?

Thanks for the help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhysicsBoyMan