A Why Is the Path Integral W[J] a Vacuum-to-Vacuum Amplitude?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter PGaccount
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude Vacuum
PGaccount
Messages
85
Reaction score
25
In the functional integral approach to quantum field theory, we have

W[J] = ⟨0+|0-J = ∫ D[Φ] eiS + ∫ JΦ

Can someone give me some insight into why this path integral is a vacuum-to-vacuum amplitude. How and also why does this path integral W[J] become a vev?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't it discussed in Sredinicki's?
 
It is important to carefully take into account the "##\mathrm{i} \epsilon## prescription to understand, why this is the "vacuum-to-vacuum transition amplitude under influence of the external source ##J##". See my QFT manuscript,

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf
In Sect. 1.10 it's explained for ordinary non-relativistic QT of a single particle. It translates easily to the QFT case, which is treated in Sect. 3.5 ff.
 
I guess, because this is the partition function, ##\langle \mathrm{O} \rangle = \int e^{iS} \mathrm{O}## similar to ## \langle \mathrm{O} \rangle = \mathrm{tr \ O \rho}##, we get

$$\langle 0 | 0 \rangle = \int e^{iS}$$

@vanhees71 how does this fit in with what you said about iε?
 
Also, is there a way to interpret the infinite gaussian integral

$$\int dx \ e^{-x^T A x}$$

as a trace? I mean, is it possible to think of ##x^T A x## as a matrix element of A, i.e. ##A_{xx} = \langle x | A | x \rangle##? Then the integral can be written

$$\int dx \ e^{- A_{xx}} = tr \ e^{-A} = \left( \frac{1}{\det \mathrm{A}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} $$

Then for free field theories, ##\int e^{iS}## can be written as a trace ##tr \ e^{-A}## where A is the inverse of the propagator. This would make the analogy with ##\langle \ \rangle = tr \rho## and ##\langle \mathrm{O} \rangle = \mathrm{tr O\rho}## exact
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top