Why is the plural for moose not meese?

  • Thread starter Thread starter symbolipoint
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why the plural of "moose" is not "meese," contrasting it with the irregular plural forms of words like "goose" and "mouse." The consensus is that "moose" derives from an Algonquin word, which means it did not undergo the same vowel changes that affected other English words. The conversation highlights the complexities of English, influenced by various languages, and suggests that the question should focus on why "geese" is an exception rather than why "moose" isn't. Participants express skepticism about the sources providing explanations, particularly those promoting products like LanguageTool. Ultimately, the irregular plural forms in English reflect its historical evolution and diverse linguistic influences.
symbolipoint
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,561
Reaction score
2,004
The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search.

A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p).
Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?"
https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
 
  • Informative
Likes jack action
Science news on Phys.org
symbolipoint said:
The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search.

A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p).
Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?"
https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
Of course it's not "meeses", it's "meeces"!
As in "I hate those meeces to pieces" - to quote Mr. Jinks.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Likes Bystander and DaveC426913
symbolipoint said:
A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p).
Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?"
https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
Given that this is a shill for their product LanguageTool, I am skeptical about their version of facts. 🤔



Anyway,

I think the question is not "Why is it moose and not meese?"; I think the question is "Why is it geese and not gooses?"

Because it's geese that's the exception to the rule (along with mice and a few others).
 
Simply put, English is a language that has evolved over the centuries with a lot of input from other languages, specifically old Norse, Latin, and German.
 
bryantcl said:
Simply put, English is a language that has evolved over the centuries with a lot of input from other languages, specifically old Norse, Latin, and German.
Diplomatically put.

I'd say English is three languages standing on each other's shoulders, wearing a trenchcoat, pretending to be a real language.
 
  • Wow
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes difalcojr, BillTre and symbolipoint
DaveC426913 said:
Diplomatically put.

I'd say English is three languages standing on each other's shoulders, wearing a trenchcoat, pretending to be a real language.
If I wasn't a native speaker I would refuse to learn it.
 
bryantcl said:
Simply put, English is a language that has evolved over the centuries with a lot of input from other languages, specifically old Norse, Latin, and German.
And sometimes from languages of other regions, such as indigenous ones from places in North America.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Given that this is a shill for their product LanguageTool, I am skeptical about their version of facts.
The bit of consistent information also occurred in another web site/page. I simply included the link to the first page found which had the explanation.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
DaveC426913 said:
I think the question is not "Why is it moose and not meese?"; I think the question is "Why is it geese and not gooses?"

Because it's geese that's the exception to the rule (along with mice and a few others).
Old Germanic (s,p) - regular plurals
Goose = /go:s, go:si/
Mouse = /mu:s, mu:siz/
Moose = was ist das?*

Old/Middle English - i-mutation occurs, causing the root vowel of the plural to be pronounced closer to the vowel of the ending;
then loss of the redundant ending (as you now can distinguish the number even if you omit the ending)
Goose = /go:s, ge:s/
Mouse = /mu:s, my:s/
Moose = hwat is thaet?*

Early Modern English - great vowel shift occurs, raising all vowels or diphtongising those that couldn't be raised further
Goose = /gu:s, gi:s/
Mouse = /maus, mais/
Moose = behold this magnificent animal, the Indians call it /mu:s/

I.e., as the link said, moose was introduced to the language after the vowel changes that generated the irregular plurals, so it wasn't subject to change.

*or however you would write these
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Likes Klystron, PeroK and DaveC426913
  • #10
Bandersnatch said:
Old Germanic (s,p) - regular plurals
Goose = /go:s, go:si/
Mouse = /mu:s, mu:siz/
Moose = was ist das?*
Moose is from an Algonquin word; not Germanic. That was related to be part of the reason that plural does not go to "Meese".
 
  • #11
Bandersnatch said:
Moose = behold this magnificent animal, the Indians call it /mu:s/
Yah that's what seemed to be expressed in the online articles & pages.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top