TheStatutoryApe
- 296
- 4
kyleb said:I'm acknowledging Russ's claim in my question. Again, I'm curious to know working to create a balance of power in the region which would necessitate securing permanent boarders could be considered anything but more conducive to stability in the region in comparison to our current backing of Israel as they expand their colonization of the West Bank?
I can't say that it's an entirely logical position. There is some logic in the idea that the US can hold the "leash" for Isreal and try to keep it out of trouble. Much of the motivation to do this is just as selfserving as it is for promotion of stability in the region, which is likely a major element in its simultaneous destabilizing effect. Its sort of a catch 22. So long as the US works with Isreal the other nations in the area will be less willing to work diplomatically with the US. But if the US were to stop working with Isreal to work with the other nations its quite possible that all bets will be off on keeping Isreal at bey.