I Why is the total number of quantum states = 2n^2 for some n?

jerronimo3000
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If the number of possible values of L is n, and the number of possible values of m is 2*L-1, and there are 2 spin directions.. shouldn't the total number of states be 2*(number of possible L)*(Number of possible m)? But this gives 4n^2 - 2n. I am extremely confused. Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Each (different) value of l has a different number of possible of values of m, so you can't simply multiply (number of possible l)*(number of possible m).
 
Looks to me like the values of l range from 0 to n-1 so no l value equals n.
The number of possible values of l is n, but the values of l don't equal n.
 
jtbell said:
Each (different) value of l has a different number of possible of values of m, so you can't simply multiply (number of possible l)*(number of possible m).

Oh, duh..thanks, definitely clears that up! Thank you!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top