I Why Is the Velocity of an Oort Cloud Object Approximately Zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the velocity of Oort cloud objects, which is considered approximately zero due to their vast distance from the Sun and Earth. The energy of these objects is also said to be near zero, as they are in stable orbits. The concept of "approximately" is emphasized, indicating that while the velocity is not literally zero, it is negligible at such distances. The conversation suggests that understanding the context of velocity—whether linear or radial—is crucial for clarity. Calculations based on Newton's or Kepler's laws can provide insights into the actual velocity of these distant objects.
I_laff
Messages
41
Reaction score
2
I read that the the energy of an Oort cloud object is approximately zero, as in the potential energy plus the kinetic energy is equal to zero. I was also told that the radius was approximately infinite and the velocity is approximately zero. I understand why the radius is said to be infinite (since it is so far away from the Earth, it's radius from the itself to the Earth is treated as infinite).

However, what I do not understand is why the velocity of the Oort cloud object is zero. Any help on understanding why this is the case?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Could you post a link to the article that you're referring to?

It sounds like they may have been referring to the radial velocity w.r.t. the earth. That would be pretty small.
 
It's just something from my lecture notes. Here is the extract, 'There are lots of debris left over from the formation of the Solar System, some of which forms the Oort cloud in the very outer Solar System. What is the typical energy of an Oort cloud object? The energy (E) is approximately 0 as the orbit is stable and v is approximately 0, r is approximately inf.'
 
I think that your notes are incomplete. It's going to be difficult for anyone to help you decipher what you wrote during a lecture. Was the lecturer referring to radial velocity or speaking of velocity in some other context? Similar logic for the other questions. Only you and the lecturer can say for sure. I would take your notes to him and see if he can help you with what you missed.
 
I believe the velocity that is being referred to is the linear velocity of a particle in orbit (i.e. the velocity at one moment of time during the orbit).

Orite, thanks for the help anyways :smile:
 
In the same way as the distance is approximately infinite, the orbital velocity is also approximately zero. At that distance an object needs hardly any velocity to stay in orbit.
The key word is 'approximately', of course.

Should be easy to calculate either from Newton's or Kepler's laws how close to 0 it is for an object in a circular orbit at, say, 1 ly from the Sun.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top