MHB Why is the Yorke-Kaplan conjecture still unresolved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joppy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture
AI Thread Summary
The Yorke-Kaplan conjecture remains unresolved despite claims of a proof in the 1980s, which may have contained flaws not widely acknowledged. Participants in the discussion express uncertainty about the reasons for its continued status as a conjecture, suggesting that pathological cases might complicate the matter. The MathWorld article is referenced as a source that mentions the conjecture was "proved" but fails to address any potential errors in that proof. The conversation highlights the challenges in verifying the conjecture and the importance of reliable sources in mathematical discourse. Overall, the conjecture's unresolved status continues to intrigue mathematicians.
Joppy
MHB
Messages
282
Reaction score
22
I read somewhere that this was proved sometime in the 80's, but that same source didn't mention that the proof was wrong. Of course I would cite the source but I can't find it again.. Does anyone know of any specific reason why this is still a conjecture?

I realize that for these sorts of measures there is often some pathological or special case getting in the way. Is that what is happening here?

Thanks :).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The MathWorld article fits your description (mentions that it was "proved" in the 1980's, but does not mention a flaw in the proof), but I'm not sure if that's what you were thinking of.
 
Ackbach said:
The MathWorld article fits your description (mentions that it was "proved" in the 1980's, but does not mention a flaw in the proof), but I'm not sure if that's what you were thinking of.

Thanks Ackbach! I'm not sure it's the same article.. but I should have checked at MathWorld anyway since there is a nice paper trail there :). Thanks again.
 

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Similar threads

Is the Collatz Conjecture Finally Close to a Proof?
Replies
6
Views
3K
A Shinichi Mochizuki's ABC Conjecture and Replication Crisis in Maths
Replies
33
Views
7K
Is the Collatz Conjecture's Behavior Predicted by Binary Representations?
Replies
1
Views
2K
A Quantum Interest Conjecture and negative energy-density
Replies
3
Views
3K
Why doesnt Bertrand's postulate imply Legendre's conjecture?
Replies
20
Views
11K
Approximating the reals by rationals (Littlewood's Conjecture)
Replies
2
Views
5K
Erdos conjecture on arithmetic progression
Replies
3
Views
4K
I Meaning of "passage to the quotient"?
Replies
3
Views
499
Is mathematics invented or discovered?
Replies
2
Views
115
I Is there any interpretation of QM that doesn't clash with intuition?
Replies
35
Views
561

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top