Why Is Total Mass Used as the Denominator in the Center of Mass Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The center of mass equation uses total mass as the denominator to calculate a weighted average of the positions of all mass components in a system. This approach ensures that each mass contributes proportionally to its position, reflecting the overall distribution of mass. The suggestion to use a component-specific total mass misinterprets the nature of mass as a scalar quantity rather than a vector. Understanding that mass does not have directional components clarifies why the total mass of the system is appropriate for the calculation. The equation effectively represents the balance point of the entire mass distribution.
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
so for the center of mass of an object..

x = (m1x1 + m2x2 + ...) / M total
y = (m1y1 + m2y2 + ...) / M total

how come in this equation the denominator is the total mass of the system? It seems like it would make more sense to have the denominator the total mass in whatever component you are trying to figure out...

i feel like it should be
x = (m1x1 + m2x2 + ...) / Mx total

and though i realize this is wrong i was hoping somebody could see what i think i see and explain where my thinking is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simply put, it's a weighted average.
 
Last edited:
Mass is also not a vector quantity (it has no components like a force, for instance).
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

I A gravity conundrum involving a solid cylinder
Replies
3
Views
2K
Center of Mass (Subtraction over addition)
Replies
7
Views
3K
I Gravity at Earth's poles vs equator
Replies
12
Views
2K
Center of Mass of separating Orbiting Mass
Replies
2
Views
1K
Center of Mass Help: Understanding Concepts & Equations
Replies
4
Views
3K
B What is Mass?
Replies
23
Views
2K
Center of mass and momentum- A question about systems
Replies
25
Views
1K
Calculate the speed and angle of the center of mass before a collision
Replies
3
Views
856
I How does the mass of the wheels affect the car's acceleration?
Replies
15
Views
4K
Gravitational Forces between two masses
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top