Why it's (1/2)? [Electric Potential Energy]

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formula for electric potential energy, specifically why it includes a factor of 1/2 in the expression qiVi. The reasoning provided is that including both terms for the interaction between two charges results in double counting the same pair. Therefore, to avoid this redundancy, the factor of 1/2 is necessary. This clarification helps in understanding the correct application of the formula in calculating potential energy. The importance of accurately counting pairs in physics is emphasized.
Antonius
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
upload_2015-9-12_15-30-47.png

My question is, why it's 1/2 [qiVi]? Shouldn't it just be qiVi?

Thank you ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to count "pairs"...
That is, if you include both \frac{q_1q_2}{r_{12}} and \frac{q_2q_1}{r_{21}}, you are counting the same "pair" twice.
 
  • Like
Likes Antonius
robphy said:
You want to count "pairs"...
That is, if you include both \frac{q_1q_2}{r_{12}} and \frac{q_2q_1}{r_{21}}, you are counting the same "pair" twice.
Oh I see,
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top