I Why measure the speed of light in one direction?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter James Hasty
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The speed of light in a vacuum is a constant determined by the electric permittivity and magnetic permeability, as described by Maxwell's equations. This constancy is independent of the observer's motion and influenced Einstein's development of Special Relativity. While Maxwell's equations can be adapted to non-orthogonal coordinates, this does not affect physical measurements. The one-way speed of light is considered a convention rather than a measurable fact of nature. Understanding this distinction is crucial for validating theories against experimental data.
James Hasty
Messages
15
Reaction score
9
TL;DR Summary
It may be shown from the Maxwell Equations for electromagnetism that the speed of light is a constant regardless of the motion of the observer. So why bother trying to measure the speed of light in one direction?
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) .
This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can construct Maxwell's equations in non-orthogonal coordinates if you like. Then you'll get a non-isotropic speed. As always, this has no effect on any physical measurement.
 
  • Like
Likes Sagittarius A-Star and PeroK
In general, you like to try to validate your theories against experiment. However, in this case the one way speed of light is a convention that you choose and not a fact of nature that you measure.
 
  • Like
Likes James Hasty, Sagittarius A-Star and Ibix
James Hasty said:
TL;DR Summary: It may be shown from the Maxwell Equations for electromagnetism that the speed of light is a constant regardless of the motion of the observer. So why bother trying to measure the speed of light in one direction?
You could write Maxwell's equations in the following primed coordinates (given any inertial coordinate system x,y,z,t).
$$x' = x \ \ \ \ \ y' = y \ \ \ \ \ z' = z \ \ \ \ \ t' = t + \frac{kx}{c}$$Source:
https://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath229/kmath229.htm

Then the one-way (cordinate-)speed of light will be anisotropic in ##\pm x'## direction.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes James Hasty, Dale and Ibix
My viewpoint is that for all inertial observers with Minkowski coordinates, Maxwell's equations posit the speed of light to be isotropic. But YES, I agree with your comments. Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes Sagittarius A-Star and Dale
James Hasty said:
TL;DR Summary: It may be shown from the Maxwell Equations for electromagnetism that the speed of light is a constant regardless of the motion of the observer.
That's not completely correct. Before Einstein, when the physically relevant coordinate transformation was thought to be the GT, Maxwell's theory was thought to be strictly true in only one inertial frame - that of still ether.

Source: Chapter "6.1 Transformation of the Field Vectors" in W. Rindler "Essential Relativity".
https://www.amazon.com/-/de/dp/3540100903?tag=pfamazon01-20

According to SR, Maxwell's equations are strictly true in each inertial frame.
 
Last edited:
James Hasty said:
My viewpoint is that for all inertial observers with Minkowski coordinates, Maxwell's equations posit the speed of light to be isotropic.
This must be true, because the definition of such coordinates is based on the Einstein clock synchronization, that means on the definition, that the one-way speed of light is the same in opposite directions.
 
Back
Top