Why metals more dense than semiconductors?

ziadett
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
this question was in my material science exam .
by the way I'm not very good at this subject
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not all metals have greater density than semiconductors, Si (2.330 g/cc) and Ge (5.323 g/cc). The group 1 and most 2 elements have lower density than Ge, several have lower density than Si.

See - http://www.webelements.com/webelements/properties/text/image-balls/density.html

Besides increasing atomic mass, the crystal structure determines the density, i.e. the lattice parameters or interatomic spacing.

Si: Space group: Fd-3m (Space group number: 227)
http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Si/xtal.html
Structure: diamond
Cell parameters:
a: 543.09 pm
b: 543.09 pm
c: 543.09 pm

Ge: Space group: Fm-3m (Space group number: 225)
http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Ge/xtal.html
Structure: ccp (cubic close-packed)
Cell parameters:
a: 565.75 pm
b: 565.75 pm
c: 565.75 pm

Fe: Space group: Im-3m (Space group number: 229)
Structure: bcc (body-centred cubic)
Cell parameters:
a: 286.65 pm
b: 286.65 pm
c: 286.65 pm

Ni:Space group: Fm3m (Space group number: 225)
Structure: ccp (cubic close-packed)
Cell parameters:
a: 352.4 pm
b: 352.4 pm
c: 352.4 pm

Look at crystal structures -
http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/periodic-table/xtal.html
Click on particular element in table to see crystallographic information.
 
A general quick and dirty formula

Consider the equation for the density:

\rho=\frac{An}{N_AZ}

Where
\rho = the density

n = the density of electrons in the conduction band

A = atomic mass, consider this to be a constant

N_A= Avogadro´s number

Z = valence, consider this to be a constant.

The key is n, the density of electrons in the conduction band. For metals, this is much larger than for semiconductors. In fact that´s the main difference between semiconductors and metals.

I´ll admit this is not a very satisfactory way of doing it, but I really think this is what they´re looking for. This equation allows you to compare metals and semiconductors on the same level since the atomic mass, valence and in a way, the cell structure are constants.

Now if you wanted to go further you run into problems because elemental semiconductors tend to form covalent bonds which are very directional bonds. Thus you would be forced to consider the cell structure. But in the process, you would loose the generality since metals don´t generally have the same cell structure as semiconductors. As the previous post demonstrates you begin to compare apples to oranges.
 
Last edited:
Finestructure said:
Consider the equation for the density:

\rho=\frac{An}{N_AZ}
Where did you find this equation ?

It certainly looks like you are applying it beyond its range of applicability.

By your analysis, if the density is proportional to n, then metals should be many, many orders of mangitude more dense than insulators - that you would see the same range of magnitudes in density as you see in electrical conductivity. This is certainly not true !

In fact, the statement that metals are more dense than semiconductors itself is fallacious in the absence of further clarification.
 
Last edited:
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top