Why NO multiple Laurent series ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence and definition of multiple Laurent series in several variables, contrasting them with Taylor series. Participants explore the implications of complex functions in multiple dimensions and the potential for defining such series.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why multiple Laurent series do not seem to exist, noting the presence of Taylor series in several variables.
  • Another participant asserts that multiple Laurent series do exist, highlighting the complexity of functions in several variables.
  • A third participant proposes a symbolic expression for a Taylor (or Laurent) series in several variables, suggesting that expansion coefficients depend on the remaining variables.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the existence of multi-variable Laurent expansions, questioning if there are mathematical restrictions similar to those for inverse functions in several variables.
  • A later reply inquires about the convergence of a multiple Laurent series for an analytic function, specifically asking if it can converge on certain polydiscs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the existence and definition of multiple Laurent series, with some asserting their existence while others express skepticism or confusion regarding their application and convergence.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention potential limitations in understanding multi-variable Laurent series, including the complexity of analytic functions and convergence criteria in multiple dimensions.

zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
why NO multiple Laurent series ??

why are ther Taylor series in several variables [tex](x_{1} , x_{2} ,..., x_{n}[/tex] but there are NO Laurent series in several variables ? why nobody has defined this series , or why they do not appear anywhere ?

i think there are PADE APPROXIMANTS in serveral variables but i have never NEVER heard of multiple Laurent series.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


? There are. Of course, a complex function of a single complex variable already involves 4 real dimensions so functions of several complex variables are not normally covered in a first course in complex analysis.
 


A Taylor (Laurent) series in several variables ought to be thought of in the following way:

If you perform an expansion with respect to any of the arguments (say [itex]z_{1}[/itex]), then the expansion coefficients are functions of the remaining arguments. Doing this successively, you will get the following symbolic expression:

[tex] f(z_{1}, \ldots, z_{n}) = \sum_{p_{1}, \ldots, p_{n} = -\infty}^{\infty}{K_{p_{1}, \ldots,p_{n}} \, (z_{1} - a_{1})^{p_{1}} \, \ldots \, (z_{n} - a_{n})^{p_{n}}}[/tex]

where

[tex] K_{p_{1}, \ldots, p_{n}} = \frac{1}{(2 \pi i)^{n}} \, \oint_{C_{1}}{\ldots \oint_{C_{n}}{f(z_{1}, \ldots, z_{n}) \, (z_{1} - a_{1})^{-1-p_{1}} \, \ldots \, (z_{n} - a_{n})^{-1-p_{n}} \, dz_{1} \, \ldots \, dz_{n}}}[/tex]
 


HallsofIvy said:
? There are. Of course, a complex function of a single complex variable already involves 4 real dimensions so functions of several complex variables are not normally covered in a first course in complex analysis.

oh , so you can have multi-variable LAURENT expansion ? , i thought there was some kind of mathematical restriction for them in the same way you can not define in general the inverse function in several variables ?

could you point me a book about an example of multi-variable Laurent series ? thanks a lot in advance

EDIT: i was thinking about this double Laurent series for the calculation of multiple integrals

[tex]\iiint _{D}dxdydx Log(x+yzx^{4})artan(x+1+y+z)[/tex] then expanding into a multiple Laurent series in powers of x , y and z we can calculate [tex]\iiint dxdydz x^{m}y^{n}z^{k}[/tex] here 'D? is a rectangle on [tex]R^3 -(0)[/tex]
 
Last edited:


and how about the CONVERGENCE ??

given an analytic function [tex]f(z1,z2)[/tex] could you expand it into a CONVERGENT multiple Laurent series so it converges on the polydisc [tex]|z1| > 1[/tex] and [tex]|z2| >1[/tex] ??
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
5K