Why rainbow has a shape of arc and why its ends are bent down.

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter paweld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arc Rainbow Shape
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the formation of rainbows, specifically their arc shape and the downward bend of their ends. Rainbows appear opposite the sun at an angle of approximately 42 degrees due to the reflection and refraction of light within raindrops. The phenomenon can be observed in its entirety when viewed from an airplane or by spraying water in a fine mist while facing away from the sun. The discussion also highlights that the apparent size of the rainbow is influenced by the observer's position and the refractive index of the water droplets involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of light refraction and reflection principles
  • Familiarity with the geometry of angles, particularly 42 degrees
  • Knowledge of the behavior of light in different mediums, such as water and ice
  • Basic concepts of optics, including the formation of halos and sun dogs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of light refraction in water droplets
  • Explore the differences between rainbows formed by raindrops and those formed by ice crystals
  • Investigate the effects of varying refractive indices on the appearance of rainbows
  • Learn about the formation of halos and sun dogs in atmospheric optics
USEFUL FOR

Anyone interested in atmospheric phenomena, including meteorologists, educators, and students studying optics and light behavior.

paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
why rainbow has a shape of arc and why its "ends" are bent down.

Can anyone explain why rainbow has a shape of arc and why its "ends" are bent down.
 
Science news on Phys.org


A rainbow's position is always opposite the sun at a particular angle. If you could see the rainbow in its entirety, you would see that it forms a perfect circle around the point exactly opposite the sun from you.

This is a picture of a rainbow as seen from an airplane. Since there's no ground in the way, you can see how the rainbow goes all the way around. Notice the shadow of the airplane where the photographer is taking the pic from. The shadow is dead centre of the rainbow. That's because the sun, the viewer and the centre of the rainbow are all on the same axis.

119_1931-CircularRainbow.jpg
 
Last edited:


Dont rainbows only occur st specific angles of reflection too? (40 odd degrees rings a bell)

You can get double rainbows if there is enough light, on the outer one the colour pattern is reversed (its always much dimmer). I think this is about 50 odd degrees.
 


DaveC426913 said:
A rainbow's position is always opposite the sun at a particular angle. If you could see the rainbow in its entirety, you would see that it forms a perfect circle around the point exactly opposite the sun from you.

This is a picture of a rainbow as seen from an airplane. Since there's no ground in the way, you can see how the rainbow goes all the way around. Notice the shadow of the airplane where the photographer is taking the pic from. The shadow is dead centre of the rainbow. That's because the sun, the viewer and the centre of the rainbow are all on the same axis.

119_1931-CircularRainbow.jpg
You can see the rainbow in its entirety by spraying a fine mist with a hosepipe on a sunny day.
Just spray with a circular motion at a point exactly opposite the sun.
ie.with your back towards the sun and a rainbow circle will appear.
The reason why it is arced or circular is because the edge of the arc or circle is the transposition of the edge of the round sun.
 


Buckleymanor said:
You can see the rainbow in its entirety by spraying a fine mist with a hosepipe on a sunny day.
Just spray with a circular motion at a point exactly opposite the sun.
ie.with your back towards the sun and a rainbow circle will appear.
The reason why it is arced or circular is because the edge of the arc or circle is the transposition of the edge of the round sun.
So it is not a perfect circle only as perfect as the circle the edge of the sun makes.
 


Buckleymanor said:
The reason why it is arced or circular is because the edge of the arc or circle is the transposition of the edge of the round sun.
It is nothing to do with the shape of the sun. When sunlight hits a raindrop, some of the light gets reflected through an angle of about 42° (and different colours are reflected through a slightly different angle). For the reflected light to hit your eye, the raindrop needs to be at a position that is 42° away from the direction of your own shadow relative to you. So all of these raindrops lie in a cone of semi-angle 42° with yourself at the vertex.

For more details see Rainbow on Wikipedia.
 


DrGreg said:
It is nothing to do with the shape of the sun. When sunlight hits a raindrop, some of the light gets reflected through an angle of about 42° (and different colours are reflected through a slightly different angle). For the reflected light to hit your eye, the raindrop needs to be at a position that is 42° away from the direction of your own shadow relative to you. So all of these raindrops lie in a cone of semi-angle 42° with yourself at the vertex.

For more details see Rainbow on Wikipedia.
Well I don't know who wrote the Wiki article but it's wrong.
Take this bit.

Seawater has a higher refractive index than rain water, so the radius of a 'rainbow' in sea spray is smaller than a true rainbow.

The water sprayed from a hosepipe has the same refractive index as rainwater but the radius of the rainbow is smaller than a true rainbow or one cast from sea-spray.
 


Buckleymanor said:
Well I don't know who wrote the Wiki article but it's wrong.
Take this bit.

Seawater has a higher refractive index than rain water, so the radius of a 'rainbow' in sea spray is smaller than a true rainbow.

The water sprayed from a hosepipe has the same refractive index as rainwater but the radius of the rainbow is smaller than a true rainbow or one cast from sea-spray.
Would you be happier if the article said "subtended angle" instead of "radius"?
 


DrGreg said:
Would you be happier if the article said "subtended angle" instead of "radius"?
It would still be wrong if it said subtended angle.
The size of the radius or angle depends more on where the rain, sea spray or hosepipe spray falls from the observer.
The distance from him.
Rather than the refractive index causing the angle.
I suppose you could spray some salt water and some rain water on a sunny day and measure the angles or radia.
The Wiki article does not explain in detail though how that might be it just states the radius is smaller in sea spray.Well depending were you are sat it ain't.
 
  • #10


Buckleymanor said:
It would still be wrong if it said subtended angle.
The size of the radius or angle depends more on where the rain, sea spray or hosepipe spray falls from the observer.
The distance from him.
Rather than the refractive index causing the angle.
I suppose you could spray some salt water and some rain water on a sunny day and measure the angles or radia.
The Wiki article does not explain in detail though how that might be it just states the radius is smaller in sea spray.Well depending were you are sat it ain't.
I don't follow what you are saying here.

You do understand we are talking about the apparent size as seen within the eye (an angle), not a distance in metres?

Light travels in a straight line from the sun, hits a raindrop and gets reflected through about 42° within that raindrop, then then travels in a straight line to your eye. In a salty raindrop the angle is about 0.8° less than in a plain-water raindrop.

There's a nice picture here.
 
  • #11


DrGreg said:
I don't follow what you are saying here.

You do understand we are talking about the apparent size as seen within the eye (an angle), not a distance in metres?

Light travels in a straight line from the sun, hits a raindrop and gets reflected through about 42° within that raindrop, then then travels in a straight line to your eye. In a salty raindrop the angle is about 0.8° less than in a plain-water raindrop.

There's a nice picture here.
I realize that we are talking about the apparent size as seen within the eye the Wiki article was not so clear.
That is why I mentioned spraying salt water and rain water and then measuring the angles.
No need to do that as the picture shows the difference in angles.
Thanks for taking the trouble to find and post.
Would a point source of light instead of the sun form a rainbow or circle in the same way.
 
  • #12


Buckleymanor said:
Would a point source of light instead of the sun form a rainbow or circle in the same way.
Yes.
 
  • #13


The diagrams below illustrate the mechanism.

The top-left diagram shows a rainbow in sunlight (or other very distant source). You have to imagine this diagram rotated around the vertical axis to get the circular arc, as shown in the bottom-left diagram.

The right-hand diagram shows a rainbow from a closer source of light. Note that the apparent radius (i.e. angle) is larger.

If the depth of the rainy area (i.e. distance from back to front relative to the observer) is large, the quality of the rainbow will be degraded. Relative to the observer, the red raindrops are not all in the same direction, unlike the case in sunlight. Instead of seeing all the colours of the rainbow, you are more likely to see a white rainbow with red and blue fringes. The quality will depend on the depth of the rainy area and the distance from the light source. A shallow rainy area will improve the colour (i.e. more rainbow-like) but also decrease the brightness.
 

Attachments

  • Rainbow.png
    Rainbow.png
    16.5 KB · Views: 815
  • #14


The top-left diagram shows a rainbow in sunlight (or other very distant source). You have to imagine this diagram rotated around the vertical axis to get the circular arc, as shown in the bottom-left diagram.

The right-hand diagram shows a rainbow from a closer source of light. Note that the apparent radius (i.e. angle) is larger.
So can the distance of the Sun from the Earth's orbit around it have an effect on the size of the cicular arc of a rainbow.
The apparent radius(i.e. angle) being larger in winter and smaller in sumer.
 
  • #15


Buckleymanor said:
So can the distance of the Sun from the Earth's orbit around it have an effect on the size of the cicular arc of a rainbow.
The apparent radius(i.e. angle) being larger in winter and smaller in sumer.
No. The sun's rays are effectively parallel over the span of a rainbow. Changing the sun's distance will change this by a trivially small angle - minutes or seconds of degrees of arc.

The primary factors in the radius of the arc are the refractive index of water and the geometry of the observer and mist cloud.
 
  • #17


nucleus said:
Besides water droplets you can also get reflections off ice crystals. Sun dogs and halos are formed that way.

On spaceweather yesterday there is a picture of a fogbow at night taken in Northern Canada..
http://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=25&month=12&year=2009

Note (as you say) that, with ice crystals it's caused by reflection whereas with water it's refraction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K