Why Si is Not Suitable for Creating Light

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dervast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Si
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the suitability of silicon (Si) for light emission, particularly in the context of semiconductor physics. Participants explore the properties of silicon as an indirect band-gap material and its implications for optical transitions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that silicon is not suitable for creating light because it is an indirect band-gap material, which complicates optical transitions.
  • Others mention that recent research has demonstrated the potential for silicon-based photonic devices using the Raman effect, suggesting some capability for light generation.
  • A participant explains the difference between direct and indirect band-gap materials, highlighting that in direct band-gap materials, optical transitions are more probable, while in indirect band-gap materials like silicon, these transitions are less likely due to the differing momentum of the valence band maximum and conduction band minimum.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on why optical transitions in silicon are improbable, prompting a detailed explanation about the momentum requirements for transitions in indirect band-gap materials.
  • It is emphasized that a photon lacks sufficient momentum to facilitate the transition from the valence band to the conduction band in silicon, which is a key factor in its inefficiency for light emission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the classification of silicon as an indirect band-gap material and the implications for optical transitions, but there is ongoing exploration of its potential applications in photonic devices, indicating some disagreement about the extent of silicon's capabilities.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of direct and indirect band gaps, as well as the specific conditions under which silicon might be utilized in photonic applications.

dervast
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
Hi i was reading yesterday in a semiconductor lessons that the Si is not suitable for creating light.. Do u know why is this happening?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Not suitable" is correct in a simplistic sense, because crystalline Silicon is not a direct band-gap material. However, over these last two years, researchers have shown that you can make Silicon based photonic devices, using the Raman effect.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indirect_bandgap
 
To speak more of this, there are semiconductors with Direct band gaps and Indirect band gaps.
In direct band gap materials optical transitions are more probable eg:- GaAs. Here valance band maximum and conduction band minimum lie at same K-value.
Where as in indirect band gap materials optical processes are not dominant eg:-Si, Ge .Here VB maximum and CB minimum are at different K-values.So the incoming photon has to be excited first to a virtual state and then to the conduction minimum.
 
Thx a lot but how can u explain me that optical transitions in Si are not propable to occur? How the indirects bands affect these transitions
 
dervast said:
Thx a lot but how can u explain me that optical transitions in Si are not propable to occur? How the indirects bands affect these transitions
This is clearly explained in the article I linked. An indirect bandgap is one when the VB maximum and CB minimum have different crystal momenta. For an electron to go from the first to the second, it needs a considerable change in momentum. A photon does not have enough momentum to make this change possible; so a photon can not facilitate this transition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K