1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Why stress is defined on 3 surface

  1. Feb 14, 2016 #1
    https://www.google.ca/search?q=stre...m=isch&q=stress+tensor&imgrc=xK8-tGSPxXha7M%3



    This is a simple question.

    -why stress is defined on 3 surfaces only instead of the entire 6 surfaces? I believe 3 surfaces are enough to explain the stress of a small cube. At static equilibrium, the opposite surfaces will experience the same stress but with the opposite direction. Is this right?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 15, 2016 #2
    Yes, if the state of stress is homogeneous. If not, the stresses on one side of a cube can be slightly different from the corresponding stresses on the other side of the small cube.

    Using a cube is just a way to get you started understanding the stress tensor. But really, the stress tensor is defined at each point in a material. Within this context, it is better to learn the advanced treatment in which the Cauchy Stress Relationship is used to determine the "traction vector" on a differential area of arbitrary orientation at a given location in a medium.

    Chet
     
  4. Feb 16, 2016 #3
    Thank you for your answer.

    I understood it this way. if we find the moment then it will end up that the opposite surface will have stress components with the same magnitude but with the opposite directions because moment should be 0.


    so, I assume this is true
    *iff the cube is under static equilibrium.



    Also, I have another question.

    I looked up tensor briefly, and I have a question.
    Angle Beta is preserved, and I dont know how it should be. Is this a tensor property that preserved for any type of coordinate system?

    if so, could you tell me that how I can mathmatically and physically interpret this.
     

    Attached Files:

  5. Feb 16, 2016 #4

    DrDu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I think it is implicit in these pictures of cubes that the cube is infinitesimally small, so that this difference becomes negligible also if stress in the material is non-homogeneous.
     
  6. Feb 16, 2016 #5
    Well, this is how they teach it to get us started. But, when we do differential force balances to obtain the Stress-Equilibrium equations in solid mechanics or the Navier Stokes equations in fluid mechanics, these stresses are taken to change from one side of the differential cube to the other, and these changes become key terms in the final differential force balance equations.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook