Why Tapered Beams Used for Roof Support?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hyper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Tapered beams are utilized for roof support to optimize material usage, as internal moments are larger at the beam's center than at the ends. The center of the beam must support not only the roof load but also the weight of the beam itself, resulting in greater internal moments. This design approach minimizes material waste by reducing the cross-sectional area where the moment is zero, particularly at the free end of the beam. Understanding the relationship between load distribution and internal moments is crucial for effective structural design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium in structural engineering
  • Knowledge of internal moments and bending in beams
  • Familiarity with cantilever beam design principles
  • Basic concepts of material optimization in structural design
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in structural analysis
  • Learn about beam bending theory and moment calculations
  • Explore cantilever beam design and load distribution techniques
  • Investigate material optimization strategies in structural engineering
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, architects, and students in civil engineering who are involved in designing and analyzing roof support systems and optimizing material usage in construction.

hyper
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I have a statics question. In my book under a picture it says.

"To save material the beams used to support the roof of this shelter where tapered since the roof loadings will produce a larger internal moment at the beams' centers than at their ends."

picture:

http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/8010/bilde001sp4.jpg

But why will the roof produce larger internal moments at the beams ends?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi hyper! :smile:

It seems a daft way of putting it, but I think they just mean that the end of the beam only has to support the roof above it, but the centre of the beam has to support the end of the beam also, and therefore the weight of the whole of the roof.
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi hyper! :smile:

It seems a daft way of putting it, but I think they just mean that the end of the beam only has to support the roof above it, but the centre of the beam has to support the end of the beam also, and therefore the weight of the whole of the roof.

Wow thanks, that's smart!
 
I have thought some more about this and I think you are wrong tiny-tim. Why would the center have to support mroe? And what does this have to do with the moment?
 
hyper said:
I have thought some more about this and I think you are wrong tiny-tim. Why would the center have to support mroe? And what does this have to do with the moment?

Hi hyper! :smile:

Because the moment is the turning force that tends to make the beam bend (or break).

For example, the same force twice as far from the centre has twice the moment, and therefore need twice the strength to counter it.

And the centre of the beam needs to be thicker than the ends because ultimately all the force passes through the centre. :smile:
 
hyper said:
I have a statics question. In my book under a picture it says.

"To save material the beams used to support the roof of this shelter where tapered since the roof loadings will produce a larger internal moment at the beams' centers than at their ends."

picture:

http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/8010/bilde001sp4.jpg

But why will the roof produce larger internal moments at the beams ends?

That is not what it is saying. The quote says that beam center will hold the most internal moment, which is not it's end. To illustrate, draw a cantilever beam of length L (i.e. a beam with a fixed support at one end and free at the other end). Furthermore, place a distributed load w along the length of the beam. With this structure in static equilibrium and within the elastic range, the largest internal moment will be located at the fixed end and will equal in magnitude to (w)(L^2)/2. The magnitude of the internal moment at the free end will be 0, and moments in between will gradually decrease parabolic as you travel away from the fixed end. Now let's talk design. The cross sectional area "needed" to handle the internal moment must be bigger at the fixed support than at the end because a larger cross sectional area must be needed to support a larger internal moment. If the beam was chosen to be perfectly rectangular, material would be wasted because you now have a large cross sectional area at the free end of the beam supporting a theoretical zero moment. That is why the beam's area becomes smaller as it travels away from the fixed support in a parabolic fashion.

Hope this helps! :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K